sent from a phone
> Am 27.07.2015 um 08:56 schrieb Tom Pfeifer :
>
> Consequently I agree that the dedicated holiday resort should not
> be tagged landuse=military as the land is not used for this purpose.
recreation and entertainment of soldiers are genuine military uses, essential
parts in
sent from a phone
> Am 27.07.2015 um 02:51 schrieb Richard Welty :
>
> i see that
> access=military has been discussed in the past (for roads) and dismissed,
> or i would suggest that.
there's a difference between a road where all military has access to and a
hotel where only the guests have
sent from a phone
> Am 27.07.2015 um 02:41 schrieb John Willis :
>
> Martin brought up that in some counties, the military is the police.
>
> Defining all the police stations as military facilities would equally be
> wrong.
The actual situation is the other way round in Italy: part of the
sent from a phone
> Am 27.07.2015 um 01:23 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
> The word "and" above .. if applied logically would mean all of those things
> need to be present for the tag landuse=military to be correct.
no, natural language does not work like this. These are not logic
Richard Welty wrote on 2015-07-26 20:04:
the wiki definition for landuse=military is very broad:
For land areas owned/used by the military for whatever purpose
so the usage is correct if we strictly follow the wiki, but it still
seems odd.
which wiki page should that be?
https://wiki.ope
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 27, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
>
> access=military has been discussed in the past (for roads) and dismissed
The area all around mt fuji is a military training ground. The major roads up
the sides (which tourists drive) are criss-crossed by tracks and
On 7/26/15 7:23 PM, Warin wrote:
> On 27/07/2015 4:04 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
>
> The word "and" above .. if applied logically would mean all of those things
> need to be present for the tag landuse=military to be correct.
> Substituting "and/or" would allow the mapper to use the tag for any, so
> On Jul 27, 2015, at 3:04 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
>
> For land areas owned/used by the military for whatever purpose
Shouldn't that be "for military or related purposes?"
The military "owns"recruiting centers in malls, that wouldn't be a good fit
either.
Martin brought up that in some c
On 27/07/2015 4:04 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 7/24/15 4:07 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 23.07.2015 um 23:50 schrieb Richard Welty :
i'm not at all persuaded that this is an appropriate use of
landuse=military.
I agree that landuse=military seems a bit strange for a ho
On 7/24/15 4:07 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> Am 23.07.2015 um 23:50 schrieb Richard Welty :
>>
>> i'm not at all persuaded that this is an appropriate use of
>> landuse=military.
>
> I agree that landuse=military seems a bit strange for a holiday resort for
> civilian
Op vrijdag 24 juli 2015 heeft Andre Engels het
volgende geschreven:
> "xxx=designated" means that a road has been specifically designated
> for vehicle type xxx. "access=designated" would mean that it was
> _specifically_ designated for _everything_. A contradictio in
> terminis.
This is also how
From the wiki page [[Tag:access=designated]]:
"NOTE! The exact key/value combination access=designated should never
appear on an object."
"xxx=designated" means that a road has been specifically designated
for vehicle type xxx. "access=designated" would mean that it was
_specifically_ designated
so
landuse=resort .. does not exist .. tourism=resort .. exists .. 110
uses.. so may well not render.
access=designated
with the building tagged
building=hotel ... will get rendered
access=designated
On 24/07/2015 3:16 PM, johnw wrote:
If there was a pilots club, it wouldn't be tagged as a
sent from a phone
> Am 23.07.2015 um 23:50 schrieb Richard Welty :
>
> i'm not at all persuaded that this is an appropriate use of
> landuse=military.
I agree that landuse=military seems a bit strange for a holiday resort for
civilian employees and service staff off duty for recreation.
Are
If there was a pilots club, it wouldn't be tagged as an airport.
The facilities my be designated for military personnel, but a) this is for
recreation - not a military funtcion, and b) it is merely leased lodging.
It's like is there was a bar near the base (not on base) for marines - it
would
so this past week, i was at Disneyworld with my family. as it happens,
my wife is a civilian employee of the department of defense, so we
stayed at shades of green, a resort at Disney leased by the DoD for
use by service members, retirees and civilian employees.
for some reason, in OSM it has a bo
16 matches
Mail list logo
