[Tagging] Roads with a postal_code each side

2025-01-17 Thread santamariense
. Best, santamariense ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] New tag proposal: 'addr=milestone'

2019-10-02 Thread santamariense
> which coincidentally can match (or not match) the distance Well noted. The reference to a location marker used in an address rarely gives the exact distance. It is an approximated value with low precision, unlike the tag distance=* that is used with highway=milestone that is supposed to mark the

Re: [Tagging] New tag proposal: 'addr=milestone'

2019-10-01 Thread santamariense
> I think we're close to hitting the record for how misleading a tag name can > be. Maybe. > This is a proposal for a tag addr:milestone to allow us to specify a > distance in kilometres > (not miles), of a house (not a milestone) and the nearest milestone isn't a > stone but a sign. It could be

Re: [Tagging] New tag proposal: 'addr=milestone'

2019-10-01 Thread santamariense
This tag only comes to give a standard to something that already is being mapped off the cuff. When you search by "KM" in https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr:housenumber#values you will find 2758 addr:housenumber that contains "KM" as part of their values. Such information can be even found

Re: [Tagging] Apps of delivery

2019-05-14 Thread santamariense
> I didn't understand what you mean. Exemple : > amenity=restaurant > name=foo > delivery:operator=deliveroo;foo > mean that 2 operators are available for this restaurant : deliveroo > and the restaurant itself. Ohh sorry, well... I misunderstood you. I thought that you've meant: "foo" in "deliver

Re: [Tagging] Apps of delivery

2019-05-14 Thread santamariense
> or use the name of the poi in the delivery:operator value : > delivery:operator=deliveroo; > so you 'll never have a clash between the "fake" value and > the name of a company Possibly there'll be more than 1 POI within the same name on the same operator. ___

Re: [Tagging] Apps of delivery

2019-05-12 Thread santamariense
> delivery_contact might be better. Or simply delivery:=* . Searching in taginfo there are already 27 uses for the tag delivery:deliveroo [1], but with the value "yes" and not the link. On the other hand there is also one use for contact:deliveroo=weblink [4] > What about multiple delivery compa

[Tagging] Apps of delivery

2019-05-11 Thread santamariense
How to tag POIs that deliver by some specific apps? E.g., https://www.ifood.com.br/delivery/santa-maria-rs/cheiro-verde-rua-coronel-valenca/08b63811-671f-4da9-956b-da875e07abad Such apps work as social media, so I've thought that this case would fit in contacts, something like contact:=direct_web

Re: [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables Proposal RFC

2019-02-17 Thread santamariense
> That was actually what I had originally proposed. My role format was > stop:+00:32, though, which is only slightly different. People in this list > noted that it would corrupt existing relation roles, so I redesigned the > proposal to have no effect on existing data. The way I think it I cannot

Re: [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables Proposal RFC

2019-02-15 Thread santamariense
> I also created a proposal, but I knew in advance it wouldn't be practical > to duplicate full GTFS functionality in OSM. Well, this is not a so simple question. There're many countries around the world that have no GTFS. And, it's just what happens to us in Brazil. We are mapping intercity bus r

Re: [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables Proposal RFC

2019-02-13 Thread santamariense
> The last edit on that proposals says > > 'Made this proposal abandoned and noted that it has been replaced by the > proposed key "departures"' So look there? Yup. I've already read all proposal and it's no too clear for me where departures=* and interval=* go. I've understood that they go in the

Re: [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables Proposal RFC

2019-02-13 Thread santamariense
Why did you abandon this proposal (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_transport_schedules/Timetable_relations)? It seems to have never been voted. And, I support it. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lis

[Tagging] Hamlet is always an unincorporated place in OSM?

2018-06-04 Thread santamariense
e State, City, Country instead of City, State, Country. The question is: Is Nominatin wrong or are we mapping a thing that there not be in Brazil and a best tag should be applied? Or maybe a new tag like unincorporated=yes/no should be created to complement

[Tagging] Proposal (man_made=livestock_dip)

2017-05-20 Thread santamariense
I have proposed a feature earlier discussed just here. The proposal page on wiki OSM is that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/livestock_dip ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/

Re: [Tagging] Cattle bathroom

2017-05-07 Thread santamariense
@Jo (winfi...@gmail.com), I am not a native speaker of english (how U have seen lol), then the word to define this without ambiguity I think native speaker will choose the better word. Are there mobile versions too? Answer: I do not know mobile versions of this. It's always a big and deep structur

Re: [Tagging] Cattle bathroom

2017-05-07 Thread santamariense
Then, if amenity and farm is not for this type of thing, man_made would be a good choice: man_made=dip dip=cattle, sheep, * with useful combination: building=roof access=private, costumers I had thought about amenity because here in Brazil seems there to be communitary places for associated peop

[Tagging] Cattle bathroom

2017-05-06 Thread santamariense
about amenity=cattle_bathroom? santamariense ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging