kind of drag_lift.
>
> drag_lift + aerialway:occupancy=2 can be a t-bar, but it can also be some
> other type of drag_lift which may exist somewhere and we don't know about
> it.
>
> Janko
>
>
> 2014/1/22 Martin Koppenhoefer
>
>>
>> 2014/
I know Martin, but many people can't understand as I can read…
2014/1/22 Martin Koppenhoefer
>
> 2014/1/22 remont...@free.fr
>
>> And if drag_lift != platter != tbar,
>
>
>
>
> no, the oppposite:
> a platter is a kind of drag_lift and a t-bar is also a k
had never heard of a platter lift. I am guessing
> they are what we brits normally call either a button lift, or more usually
> a poma lift (although that's a trade mark). These are common in France.
> T-bars are more common in Austria.
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
> --
>
>
>
d of drag_lift and j-bar is a kind of drag_lift.
>
> drag_lift + aerialway:occupancy=2 can be a t-bar, but it can also be some
> other type of drag_lift which may exist somewhere and we don't know about
> it.
>
> Janko
>
>
> 2014/1/22 Martin Koppenhoefer
>
>>
>&
I agree with the idea of ski_jump is not a sport. +1 Tobias
2014/1/23 Richard Z.
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:33:41PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> > 2014/1/23 Richard Z.
> >
> > > * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to
> describe
> > > the
> > > details of a technic
Is there more type of ski_jumps, because you purpose ski_jump!
2014/1/23 Janko Mihelić
> 2014/1/23 Richard Z.
>
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:31:51PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote:
>>
> > leisure=ski_jumping_hill (over the whole area)
>> > ski_jump=take_off (or maybe better, ski_jump=in-run)
>> >
en 0 and 1.7 people per "seat" (or,
> otherwise stated, between 0% and 85%) depending on how busy it is.
>
> Colin
>
>
> On 2014-01-22 18:38, remont...@free.fr wrote:
>
> But t-bar are only platters with aerialway:occupancy=2
>
>
> 2014/1/22 Colin Smale
!= tbar, why 3S, DMC, FUNITELS, CLD, etc… don't
have any tags ???!!!
2014/1/22 Martin Koppenhoefer
>
> 2014/1/22 remont...@free.fr
>
>> But why we can't standardize these tags ?
>
>
>
> they are already standardized. We don't have 2 tags that describe
sually
> a poma lift (although that's a trade mark). These are common in France.
> T-bars are more common in Austria.
>
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
>
> --
>
>
>
> Sent from my Nokia N9
>
>
>
> On 22/01/2014 16:47 remont...@free.fr wrote:
> So, why we
But why we can't standardize these tags ?
2014/1/22 Martin Koppenhoefer
>
> 2014/1/22 remont...@free.fr
>
>> So, why we have platters, and why it is recommended on iD editor ?
>>
>
>
> I can't tell you why iD recommends this it, and more import
perienced skiers). In
> some areas like Austria the t-bar is more popular whereas in France you see
> only platters.
>
> Colin
>
>
>
>
> On 2014-01-22 17:47, remont...@free.fr wrote:
>
> So, why we have platters, and why it is recommended on iD editor ? And
>
So, why we have platters, and why it is recommended on iD editor ? And what
is the utility of t-bar, because it's a platter with 2 persons, so
aerialway:occupancy=2, no ?
I can't understand why it is duplicate. It's not good…
2014/1/22 Martin Koppenhoefer
>
> 2014/1
I think we can delete aerialway=drag_lift of Openstreetmap's wiki because
it's a duplication of platter. Same thing for t-bar, for 2 places platters,
we have the tag aerialway:occupancy=2, which is not easily parametrable in
iD editor.
___
Tagging mailing
jumping
> facilities:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ski_jumping_hill
>
> Janko
>
>
>
>
> 2014/1/21 Tobias Knerr
>
>> Am 21.01.2014 19:04, schrieb remont...@free.fr:
>> > I want you to think about a normalized tag about ski jump take_off
>> > (tre
Hello,
I want you to think about a normalized tag about ski jump take_off
(tremplins de saut à ski en français). I like sport=ski_jump_take_off. Do
you think it is a good idea? Can I document it in the wiki ?
Good bye!
PS : Please reply me remont...@free.fr because I didn't suscribed t
15 matches
Mail list logo
