this new OSM's Wikibase.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:57 PM peterkrauss
wrote:
Thanks Yuri,
... and Hello community! Lets vote?
How to start a formal and democratic process for it?
PS: will be the biggest improvement of 2018, waving with structured
data
and CC0
for government adoption o
violation), I will be happy
to make that change.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:37 PM peterkrauss
wrote:
Hi, veri good news!
About license, can by changed to CC0 as Wikidata?
It very important in structured data and data-interchange to use
CC0...
We are using Wikidata with government applications because
Hi, veri good news!
About license, can by changed to CC0 as Wikidata?
It very important in structured data and data-interchange to use CC0...
We are using Wikidata with government applications because is CC0: we
can copy/paste wikidata information to a table and publish the table
with the text
1 up.
- - - - -
Well,
* can anyone (as I) to vote? I am a database OSM user/developer (PostGIS
etc), not an experienced mapper.
* there are here an "e-mail-vote protocol" to say +1 / -1 /
abstention... ?
Em 2018-08-09 12:57, Eric H. Christensen escreveu:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE--
Em 2018-08-07 05:00, Christoph Hormann escreveu:
On Monday 06 August 2018, peterkrauss wrote:
Seems a commom quality problem of part/whole confusion in the
Wikidata attribution or OSM's POI reference... And where there are a
need for "enveloping parts into a whole".
[...]
Em 2018-08-06 20:46, François Lacombe escreveu:
Hi Peterkrauss,
Thanks François, important topics...
I second the need you mention of a relation in a whole.
Wikidata references should be unique as possible in the db.
It seems the basic premise,
"Wikidata references should be uniq
Hi,
Seems a commom quality problem of part/whole confusion in the Wikidata
attribution or OSM's POI reference... And where there are a need for
"enveloping parts into a whole".
Example:
* The railway-whole concept, Anhalt Railway
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q319837
* The railway-parts
