[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Top_up (fifth revision)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Top_up Cheers pangoSE ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Superroutes - good, bad or ugly?

+1 Sarah would you be willing to write a proposal for this? Cheers pangoSE Sarah Hoffmann skrev: (15 mars 2019 14:03:28 CET) >On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 12:07:50PM +, marc marc wrote: >> Le 15.03.19 à 12:27, Hufkratzer a écrit : >> > is that a good/sufficient reason to define a new relation type

Re: [Tagging] RFC rewritten proposal Via_ferrata_simplified

Hi On 2019-03-06 01:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > sent from a phone > >> On 5. Mar 2019, at 23:06, Richard wrote: >> >> highway=via_ferrata is supported by almost all renderers(*) and you will >> break them. >> Not only is there no need to remove it but it is highly counterproductive. >> >>

[Tagging] RFC rewritten proposal Via_ferrata_simplified

The 3 main goals of this proposal are: 1. the removal of the special tag highway=via_ferrata, 2. encouraging tagging of via ferratas as routes and 3. general improvement of the data about via ferratas in OSM via new keys. I welcome any comments and suggestions for improvements. Voting is schedu

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - new tag departures=*

4 days left of voting. On 2019-02-17 14:49, Leif Rasmussen wrote: > Voting is open for the tag departures, which states the list of > departure times in a public transport route. > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_transport_schedules/Departures > > Thanks,  > Leif Ra

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

On 2018-11-01 20:12, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:14 AM Allan Mustard > wrote: * shift to office=diplomatic and use the existing diplomatic=* additional (secondary) tag to specify whether embassy, consulate, or other, then use embass

Re: [Tagging] landuse for government offices ?

On 9/20/18 9:54 PM, SelfishSeahorse wrote: On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 11:20, egil wrote: I tend to agree with Colins arguments below, because in Sweden gov. agencies are very mixed into the central spaces of cities but often not clustered together in large complexes or whole areas. Just

Re: [Tagging] landuse for government offices ?

large complexes or whole areas. Cheers Egil On 9/20/18 10:39 AM, Colin Smale wrote: Maybe it's just me, but I really can't understand why landuse for government functions needs its own tagging. The buildings are often indistinguishable from commercial properties - what is differen

Re: [Tagging] landuse for government offices ?

+1 On 9/18/18 11:47 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: I would accept civic_admin as well. Markus - do you want to revive the proposal? I'd like to see this become a approved tag. On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:15 PM OSMDoudou <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com

Re: [Tagging] routes with double use hiking and bicycle

Hi On 2018-09-03 10:24, Volker Schmidt wrote: Bicycle and hiking routes are not rendered by the Standard OSM rendering (don't know about OSMAnd) They are rendered by OSMAnd and you can search for them by name. :D Cheers ___ Tagging mailing list T

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC: Via ferrata simplified

Hi Den 09/03/2018 kl. 02:53 PM, skrev Richard: On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 01:25:45PM +0200, egil wrote: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Via_ferrata_simplified please not a completely new utterly incompatible with everything else proposal. Many elements of the old proposal

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC: Via ferrata simplified

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Via_ferrata_simplified Cheers Egil / pangoSE ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Key:boundary_type

lying data. If anybody using these tags can clarify their use either here or preferably in the wiki, that would be nice :) Den 08/27/2018 kl. 01:59 PM, skrev egil: Hi I stumbled apon https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:boundary_type during my edits and even started a discussion abou

[Tagging] Key:boundary_type

Hi I stumbled apon https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:boundary_type during my edits and even started a discussion about its meaningfullness here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:boundary_type But until now I got no response. It is not really clear to me if this tag i

[Tagging] Discussion of deprecation of 3 tags

Hi I started a discussion of deprecation of 3 tags in the wiki. If this is not the best/appropriate way of discussing this please let me know. I suggest you participate in the discussion here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Deprecated_features#I_suggest_we_deprecate_the_following Che

Re: [Tagging] Time to deprecate place=region and boundary=region?

Hi Den 08/26/2018 kl. 02:19 AM, skrev marc marc: Le 24. 08. 18 à 18:47, egil a écrit : I much prefer boundary=administrative + border_type=region over boundary=region and place=region. some regions aren't a administrative stuff. ex with mountain area http://www.openstreetmap.org/rel

Re: [Tagging] How to tag Summer/Winter admin_centres (in Indian states)?

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:capital#How_to_deal_with_seasonal_capitals.3F Den 08/25/2018 kl. 02:29 AM, skrev Martin Koppenhoefer: sent from a phone On 24. Aug 2018, at 18:13, egil <mailto:e...@riseup.net>> wrote: JOSM complains if I put more than 1 adm

[Tagging] Time to deprecate place=region and boundary=region?

I began looking at this after finding a boundary=region in Ladakh, India that caused this region admin_level=5 not to show up in nominatim or on the main map. Of the tags mentioned below only place=region has a wiki-page where it is not marked as deprecated. I much prefer boundary=administra

[Tagging] How to tag Summer/Winter admin_centres (in Indian states)?

Is there any established way of tagging this? Cheers Egil ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] preproposal : internet webcam

On 01. des. 2013 18:11, Peter Wendorff wrote: Am 01.12.2013 16:05, schrieb Egil Hjelmeland: On 01. des. 2013 15:28, Peter Wendorff wrote: Hi, I'm not happy with contact:webcam, as the contact namespace IMHO serves a different purpose. contact:webcam could define whom to contact for ques

Re: [Tagging] preproposal : internet webcam

ards Peter Check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact Egil ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] preproposal : internet webcam

On 01. des. 2013 09:52, yvecai wrote: On 11/30/2013 06:40 PM, Egil Hjelmeland wrote: So my revised suggestion to tag a webcam public on internet is man_made=surveillance surveillance= indoor|outdoor|public * surveillance:type=camera * surveillance:zone=weather|traffic|scenic * contact:webcam

Re: [Tagging] preproposal : internet webcam

On 01. des. 2013 00:44, Martin Koppenhöfer wrote: Am 30.11.2013 um 18:40 schrieb Egil Hjelmeland : contact:webcam= is fine, that tell we have a webcam. Do we really need anything more to tell its a webcam? I think contact:webcam is nonsense, you can't contact someone via his w

Re: [Tagging] preproposal : internet webcam

On 29. nov. 2013 09:15, Martin Vonwald wrote: Hi! 2013/11/28 Egil Hjelmeland <mailto:pri...@egil-hjelmeland.no>> I still do not think man_made=surveillance is perfect. But I do not have huge problems with it as long as it is documented. If something is properly documented

Re: [Tagging] preproposal : internet webcam

On 29. nov. 2013 10:32, Jonathan wrote: I would agree, I think that covers it. A webcam is surveillance, it's a camera that is watching you making it available to anyone. Some would say that is a greater infringement than an official camera that is regulated. Maybe the wiki page needs re-wo

Re: [Tagging] preproposal : internet webcam

On 28. nov. 2013 20:07, Dan S wrote: 2013/11/28 Egil Hjelmeland : I have to my surprise not been able to find any established practice for tagging webcams on internet. I am thinking of cameras that display a place, so you can click in to see the weather, snow conditions and such. As a service

[Tagging] preproposal : internet webcam

relation? The other alternative, making lists with OSM tags seem very cumbersome? Comments? -- Egil H ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging