Re: [Tagging] Meaning of cycleway=no

2017-07-20 Thread Wiktor Niesiobedzki
2017-07-19 10:37 GMT+02:00 Adam Snape : > I agree with Wiktor that we shoud use the access tag bicycle=no when > cycling' is prohibited. > I agree with Volker that the logical meaning of cycleway=no is that there > are no cycle tracks or lanes along a section of highway. This might be > useful info

Re: [Tagging] Meaning of cycleway=no

2017-07-19 Thread Wiktor Niesiobedzki
2017-07-18 23:45 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt : > "cycleway=no" on a highway=XX object means that the road has no cycleway > associated with it, i.e. none of the values > cycleway=yes|both|left|right|lnane|... > To my knowledge the "no" value is not documented. The tag cycleway=no is > often applied by

Re: [Tagging] Meaning of cycleway=no

2017-07-19 Thread Wiktor Niesiobedzki
2017-07-18 23:32 GMT+02:00 marc marc : > Le 18. 07. 17 à 22:55, Wiktor Niesiobedzki a écrit : >> Can anybody point me to explanation of this tag value? > > I would use this tag only whre there is a traffic_sign that forbit > cycling where it shoul be allowed without this sign W

[Tagging] Meaning of cycleway=no

2017-07-18 Thread Wiktor Niesiobedzki
Hi, Recently I read in OSM Weekly about new maps by MapCat. Driven by curiosity I opened this map and when I switched to bike mode in my city I notice a lot of non-existing cycling infrastructure. After investigation I discovered that MapCat renders all values of cycleway as bike lane, what in pre