On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:28:53PM +0200, Simone Saviolo wrote:
> A sculptor (and an art gallery, often) ultimately hopes to sell his
> artwork. By that criterion, nothing would be cratfsmanship.
Heh, well, that probably goes for very many sculptors (and art
galleries), although it is possible tha
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:04:09PM +1000, Liz wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Elena of Valhalla wrote:
> > but is the bottom of such lakes a flat surface with a constant
> > elevation? if it isn't, such a value wouldn't be meaningful as well
> on some it is
> eg Lake Cargelligo is almost flat at the
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:58:47PM +1000, Ross Scanlon wrote:
> > Fair enough, but what if many people agree with the change? What if
> > convincing arguments are given for, many people agree with them, and the
> > only major disagreement is “it goes against the status quo”?
>
> Or the only disag
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:56:59AM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Am 23.08.2010 23:37, schrieb John Smith:
> >Martin, So its ok to shift stuff from tourism but not shift stuff from
> >amenity to emergency?
> No it's not ok to wiki-fiddling emergency, or tourism, or cultural
> or whatever […]
> OSM i
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:49:51AM +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/8/22 Claudius Henrichs :
> > tourism=artwork
> > + artwork_type=sculpture
>
> because of the quote above I'm raising the question: is tourism a good
> top-category? I think in many cases it is not. Even hotels are only
>
