On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:46:45 +0100, Josh Doe wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Steve Bennett
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:14 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
So:
kerb=flush
kerb=lowered
kerb=rolled
kerb=yes
kerb=raised (ie, higher than normal, for a bus/tram stop...)
Now, since
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:32:54 +0100, Josh Doe wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Seth Golub wrote:
Lowered was used in the original proposal, I'd actually prefer the term
sloped. I think that makes quite a bit more sense than lowered. Opinions?
I preferred lowered as slopped doesn't de
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:22:55 +0100, Josh Doe wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Steve Bennett
wrote:
One problem I see with these kinds of proposals is that they map very
well to a particular jurisdiction or standard, but will be very hard
to apply elsewhere. Perhaps the distinction
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:08:37 -, Serge Wroclawski
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Werner Hoch wrote:
Aerial Imagery:
---
With the new Bing images many new relations have been created that
contain boundaries of hires images. I think it would be cool to have
