On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> While there is considerable interest in historical data attached to OSM
> objects, the image tag is not the place to innovate.
>
> Photographs are inherently historical: weather and lighting can (and,
obviously, will) change; vantage points
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2012/11/8 sly (sylvain letuffe) :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like your opininion of the following proposal :
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/drop_recommendation_for_place_name
>
>
> I'm fine with dropping place_name, it was
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 21:21, John Smith wrote:
> On 14 May 2010 13:12, Steve Bennett wrote:
>> Do we agree there is a basic goal of getting everyone to tag the same
>> way? Perhaps the "propose-comment-vote-implemented" lifecycle is not
>> right, but "just start using these values" is too weak.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 18:39, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Am 06.02.2010 03:23, schrieb Jonas Stein:
>> Rationale
>> Flagpoles are important landmarks.
>> Usually they are visible over a long distance.
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/flagpole
>>
>> This is my first proposal i ho
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:57, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 2/3/10 2:20 PM, Liz wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Richard Welty wrote:
>>
>>> so should a reference route designation that isn't on a sign go in a ref
>>> tag or not? the wiki doesn't
>>> discuss this. if ref shouldn't have this, perhaps a va
