On 7 November 2012 13:13, Colin Smale wrote:
Wouldn't the route code be better in a relation? I'm sure there will be
> some bits of the network which are part of multiple routes.
>
Apologies, I meant relation.
One or more running lines are grouped together in to a route - it's
entirely possible
On 7 November 2012 13:16, Chris Hill wrote:
Megagronk has already been adding station codes. He has a list provided by
> the ATOC and permission to use it in OSM. He has not been using your scheme
> AFAIK.
>
Thanks - I'll get in touch with him and bounce some ideas around.
Peter
__
On 7 November 2012 13:27, Richard Mann wrote:
Source? Most of these things are "owned" by Network Rail, and it's not
> clear whether they are publicly available without strings.
>
> I'd love this to be available (speaking as someone who made maps of delay
> in a former life...).
>
The data was re
All,
I'm part of a group of people who are working to get a richer set of
metadata attached to the railway network in Great Britain, specifically:
- Tagging railway stations with the three-letter CRS (computer
reservation system) codes, which is widely used by train companies and the
public to
