Hi all,
We (as in Polish OSM community) have been remapping for a while now and
also repairing our road network. As a starting point for this effort we
wanted to create relations for major roads.
It's all good but some "issues" have been coming to light during this
work. One of them I posted last
These are all good arguments but I think we should give more credit to
mappers. Sorry if I'm being boring but I will again come back to
OSMonitor reports that Polish community is now using for fixing roads -
since I started publishing the reports every day I am shocked by how
quickly people fix stu
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012, at 23:55, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> No. We only create relations when the ref tag is not sufficient. We
> don't recommend that relations be created for roads otherwise, and
> anyone doing anything with the data should not expect relations to be
> there.
>
How would you d
As I wrote before in this thread in response to the hiking trail example
- this is great, I myself love mapping forest tracks for mountain biking
and stuff.
But maybe I should have made it clearer in the first place that I'm
talking about major roads - this stuff really should be in tip top shape
David,
As I wrote - I am only producing reports for Poland and for my country
there are very few complex situations and it really is straightforward
to clearly see data duplication - having ref on ways has no value
because everything is expressed in relations.
>
> If you have a tool that says "US
Hi Johan,
Here is another idea that Richard F. pointed me to on IRC:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-January/033557.html
I strongly believe that some mix of what you are writing about, what
Richard is writing about above, what Tag Central presentation contains
and what many ot
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012, at 19:44, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>
> this logic is completely flawed. humans are not robots working on a list
> of problems to solve. As you learned from your experiment there is a
> inconsistency and now you can work to fix it. This is how osm works and
> it is great t
s ;-).
Paweł
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012, at 19:12, Peter Wendorff wrote:
> Am 30.07.2012 18:58, schrieb Paweł Paprota:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I understand what you're saying about ease of use but at the same time I
> > am very concerned about the quality of data - i
so that
> someone can transfer the ref to a relation.
>
> Volker
>
> On 30 July 2012 18:58, Paweł Paprota wrote:
>
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I understand what you're saying about ease of use but at the same time I
> > am very concerned about the quality
, Peter Wendorff wrote:
> Am 30.07.2012 18:22, schrieb Paweł Paprota:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As part of the Poland remapping effort I have implemented a reporting
> > system called OSMonitor which analyzes road network in Poland in OSM
> > data and produces reports.
Hi all,
As part of the Poland remapping effort I have implemented a reporting
system called OSMonitor which analyzes road network in Poland in OSM
data and produces reports. Recently one user requested additional
validation - checking if ways in a relation for a specific road contain
proper "ref"
Hi all,
This is a "manual" response (i.e. no references header) since I have
just subscribed to the list.
> Rather than long discussions about renaming or merging tags (e.g.
> drinkable, potable), perhaps we should accept that there will be
> things for which more than one tag name is in use, and
12 matches
Mail list logo
