So, how to go on from here? My proposal stands.
To substantiate this, I found on taginfo, that network:short is actually in
usage: 21k (btw. network:long: 34)
I saw, that there are votes, but I'm totally New to the tagging mailing list..
Regards
Michael_
. So the
collisions are state of the art.
In my opinion, a little extension wouldn't be to bad - not the whole proposal,
only network and operator with :short..
Regards
Michael
>> On 22. Aug 2020, at 11:05, Michael Schmidt via Tagging
>> wrote:
>>
>> But I pr
Ok, if that's the popular opinion, I will concur.
But I prefer the short version and am tagging it..
Regards
Michael___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hello osm-taggers,
I have some trouble with the tag network=*. Not with the tag itself, but I
think it needs an extension.
Maybe the most common usage for this tag is for transport networks. But I'm not
sure how to name it right. Should it be the long or the short version of the
network's nam
