Re: [Tagging] Missing only_u_turn?

users noticing the tag (1), finding it on the wiki (2), but find it missing from their $fav_editor. That last scenario is the most likely :) -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Any support for a flow tag?

will all look great, since the geometry is correct with the flow (canvec rivers are not). Thanks for already listing a major objection against rendering implicit flow direction only based on way direction. That saves me from having to explain that part to you.

Re: [Tagging] Pls explain?

> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/man_made=dolphin > > Any ideas? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolphin_%28structure%29 -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] tagging capitals

; within its boundaries (or look it up in the relation if any). And when this tag would be absent, but Amsterdam does have capital=yes, does it then mean that I should think Amsterdam is the provincial capital? And what about the Seat of Government. Do we record that anywhere? This isn't always lo

Re: [Tagging] tagging capitals

ted. That's nearby Haarlem (admin_level=4). This scenario is real. -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Rendering locks in Mapnik/Osmarender

On 20-12-2010 22:29, Wyo wrote: Hmm, no remarks at all. Now what shall i do next to get this into renderers? In the case of mapnik: wait. The current version used on osm.org cannot rotate symbols, and we haven't transitioned to the yet-to-be-released mapnik2 either. -- Le

Re: [Tagging] Successful proposal

ures? This will only hamper adoption. -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Layer=* tags disappearing

On 12-10-2010 20:49, Lennard wrote: I'd rather not see an expansion of the integer -5 .. 5 range. Can anyone point out any area where there are more than 16 crossing highways/railways? Make that 11. :D -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Ta

Re: [Tagging] Layer=* tags disappearing

e rendered correctly. I'd rather not see an expansion of the integer -5 .. 5 range. Can anyone point out any area where there are more than 16 crossing highways/railways? -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.op

Re: [Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

nd that's mostly where my discomfort stems from. It would be fine to have the tags just for the purpose of generating dedicated railways maps that also show all the glory of past, but what the heck are they doing on the current map? -- Lennard __

Re: [Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

leway. It's called railway=disused. -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

idge=* tag. That's one thing I've never really understood with railway=abandoned either. Sure, many of them have been converted into might fine cycleways, but that's just what they are now: cycleways. -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Taggi

Re: [Tagging] musings on landuse

we're rehashing old discussions. What do you know, we are: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2009-October/000106.html Congratulations, the tagging ML is 1 year old, and we've come full circle. :-) -- Lennard ___ Tagging ma

Re: [Tagging] musings on landuse

y zones as a boundary type concept, same as national parks. -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Sea wall defence barrier

along a river tens or hundreds of $distance_unit inland? -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Sea wall defence barrier

e, we'd be done. :) [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/3dShapes [2] Tagwatch counts for NL at this moment: groyne (2596), breakwater (42), reinforced_slope (564). -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Updated cross-renderer/editor support table

#x27;t, but don't count on it staying that way forever. -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Updated cross-renderer/editor support table

x27; or ([railway]='rail' and ([service]='spur' or [service]='siding' or [service]='yard')) Especially when you take into account there also is a bridge variant to handle. So you might want to be on the lookout for things like this when updating your list. Hav

Re: [Tagging] Beaches

gree on a tag and use it. Subtag away all you want, with surface, operator, note, what-have-you. -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Dutch cafes (was: What's a power=station?)

should adhere to that advice, for a change. -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Comparison of tag support: Mapnik, Osmarender, Potlatch, JOSM, Kosmos, Map Features (wiki)

Ulf Lamping wrote: > c) why is that "power=line" and "power=tower" and lot's of others > displayed in the map have no entry in the Mapnik column? These are filtered on in the Datasource, in the SQL itself, and not i

Re: [Tagging] kosher amenities

.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=35278&dict=CALD http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/halal http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/halal -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] kosher amenities

hem, never mind when they're outright told. > There was 3 entries in the OSM wiki with 'kosher', and that's how it > was written in the first one that came up in the search: Since when has OSM's wiki become the fina

Re: [Tagging] kosher amenities

e replying to. We've read that all before, not 10 minutes earlier, no need to include it all again. BTW2: It's halal. What you lack in replying restraint, you make up for with extra letters? -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing