On 08.09.2019 11:41, Warin wrote:
> On 07/09/19 19:08, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> sent from a phone
>>> On 7. Sep 2019, at 09:28, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>>>
>>> Per taginfo, building=yes is used 7500 times with leisure=pitch, and
>>> covered=yes is used 1017 times, so I suppose it's more
This is not how the tag is used. It is often used for sports halls of
sports centers, some examples can be found in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/leisure%3Dsports_hall#Examples_in_the_OSM_database
.
The wiki page for sports_hall says "A sports hall can often be found on
a
An old related discussion about "paddock":
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/30491/horse-corral-or-any-dirt-area
On 23.08.2019 10:36, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 03:29, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
>
> Also, it's not clear to me when one would use landuse=animal_keeping
I would also prefer the transclusion (template) instead of just links.
It may be possible to split it up in and a part with more general tags
(e.g. name, ref, operator, distance, ...) that are also used with other
kinds of routes (e.g. for
route=running;bicycle;mtb;horse;piste;inline_skates),
On 13.08.2019 16:16, Paul Allen wrote:
> [...] None of those are perfect, and maybe somebody can come up with
something better. [...]
My suggestion is that the bot only updates in one direction: values of
wiki pages always take precedence and override corresponding fields in
the data elemen
On 13.08.2019 07:21, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
12 Aug 2019, 20:24 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
sent from a phone
On 12. Aug 2019, at 18:02, Andy Townsend
wrote:
I don't think it's unavoidable - presumably you can just
ignore the wikidata stuff and carry on
On 23.05.2019 01:36, marc marc wrote:
Le 23.05.19 à 01:26, Warin a écrit :
A) A physical competition played according to rules.
B) As for A) but includes practising for the sport
c) as for B) but includes non competitive physical activity.
Thoughts?
i like C but without the "with rules" incl
It would probably better to use description=* than from=* and to=*
because not all routes have a named starting point or destination point,
like e.g. a roundtrip route around some village.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lis
On 03.05.2019 12:56, o...@hjart.dk wrote:
Hufkratzer skrev den 02.05.2019 12:11:
On 30.04.2019 21:05, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:19 PM s8evq wrote:
Personally, I like signed_direction=yes. It's simple and avoids
using the word oneway.
Also, using the value fo
On 02.05.2019 12:20, Paul Allen wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 11:13, Hufkratzer <mailto:hufkrat...@gmail.com>> wrote:
For a non-roundtrip route consiting of two consecutive ways the route
direction can be deduced from the order of the ways in the relation.
Note that (last tim
On 30.04.2019 21:05, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:19 PM s8evq wrote:
Personally, I like signed_direction=yes. It's simple and avoids using the word
oneway.
Also, using the value forward|backward might not be necessary, as it's possible
to deduce this from the order of ways in
Am 31.03.2019 04:30, schrieb Warin:
On 27/03/19 20:23, Hufkratzer wrote:
On 27.03.2019 07:37, Warin wrote:
[...]
I'd still call it a 'mounting block' ... no steps in the name so it
can be a ramp or, in your case, a platform. Add wheelchair=yes and a
description=* tag ???
+
On 27.03.2019 07:37, Warin wrote:
[...]
I'd still call it a 'mounting block' ... no steps in the name so it
can be a ramp or, in your case, a platform. Add wheelchair=yes and a
description=* tag ???
+1, in wikipedia it's also called 'mounting block', see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountin
I wonder why we need a separate type=superroute if everything what can
be done with superroutes can also be done with normal routes. Example:
http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/?l#route?id=371740 is a normal hiking
route, more than 10k km long, with 7 child relations that have child
relations ag
It is indeed interesting to store that the signs work only for one
direction,
therefore oneway=yes/no is documented for hiking routes
- in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking#Tags_of_the_relation
since Jan. 2013
- in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=hiking#Tags_of_the_rela
On 12.03.2019 12:30, s8evq qrote:
> [...] I see there is also the tag "direction=" with a lot more usage.
On mini-roundabouts (as documented in the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction#Clockwise_and_anticlockwise),
but sometimes even on route=foot, route=hiking and route=bicyc
On 23.02.2019 18:47, Paul Allen wrote:
[...] As I see it, ditches are unlined. [...]
I googled for "ditch lining irrigation" and got these examples for lined
ditches:
-
http://www.northwestlinings.com/services-available/installation-services/irrigation-ditch-liner-system/
- http://www.skidm
On 23.02.2019 00:09, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> [...]
> =drain: Use waterway=drain for artificial waterways, typically lined
with concrete or similar, usually used to carry water for drainage or
irrigation purposes.
> [...]
Irrigate with drains? This was the original question of the whole dit
On 10.02.2019 14:57, Eugene Podshivalov wrote:
[...}
*Variant #2*
Combine "ditch" and "drain" tags into one.
[...}
Personally I lean toward variant 2 [...}
This would require to deprecate "drain" and remove it from the presets,
otherwise we will continue to have 2 tags in the long run. As far
On 07.02.2019 15:56 Paul Allen wrote:
Both low and high usage can be without a proposal. And if you're
allowed "de facto" for high usage
I'm allowed "ad hoc" for low usage no matter what the anti-Latin
contingent say. :)
Related proposal to have 2 different statuses:
https://forum.openstreetmap
On 04.02.2019 13:08, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
[...] If the thing makes sense, sooner or later you will get the
numbers to mark it "de-facto" even without any voting or tagging
maliing list interactions.
Which are the numbers for "de-facto" and for "in use"? I couldn't find
any documentation
On 04.02.2019 10:27, Warin wrote:
On 04/02/19 18:51, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 04.02.19 00:07, Christoph Hormann wrote:
Just to avoid misunderstandings - it is in principle completely all
right to invent tags and document them on tag/key pages without
creating a proposal.
* invent keys - o
If we were discussing a proposal I would agree, but replacing
waterway=drain by waterway=ditch + usage=drainage or sth. like that is
not such an easy task. We already have 800k drains. I assume it
requires a proposal with volting to deprecate drain, adaption of the
presets, perhaps a mass edit
On 01.02.2019 02:50 Warin wrote:
It appears in the descriptions that a 'ditch' can be used as a
'drain'. So why have a tag 'drain'?
Only if the water comes from wet land, not when it is industrial discharge
(compare
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-January/042543.html )
There is an abandoned proposal
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Ditch
titled "Drainage/Irrigation Ditch"
and the German page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:waterway=ditch
mentions "Bewässerungsgraben" which means irrigation ditch.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:waterway says:
- drain is for rain or industrial water ("Abwassergraben") -> may be
wastewater
- ditch is just for rain water ("Entwässerungsgraben") -> no wastewater
Am 11.1.2019 07:35, schrieb John Willis:
On Jan 11, 2019, at 3:00 PM, Marc Gemis <
Oh, this was new to me; I thought the rule "Any tags you like" only
applies to adding additional tags in the database and not to changing
old tags or to rewrite the documentation. I will keep that in mind.
On 5.1.2019 08:25, Warin wrote:
On 05/01/19 12:57, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Yes, should
I douibt that the description of the tag building=pavilion on its wiki
page as "A building providing facilities for users of sports grounds"
is correct. The creator of this wiki page didn't respond to a question
in this regard on the discussion page. Therefore and since I don't have
experience
On 2.9.2018 22:06 Thilo Haug OSM wrote:
{...]
The current namespace article doesn't mention underscores :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Namespace#Example_namespace_uses
I think it doesn't have to, the underscore can just be a part of a key
or a value like any letter [a-z] can.
The ame
It looks like you didn't understand me. I am sorry that my English is so
bad. I am trying to express my question in a different way:
We have some differnet ways to tag a bicycle rental:
a) amenity=bicycle_rental (30k uses), bicycle_rental=yes (< 20 uses)
b) rental=bicycle (< 300 uses) (rental:bi
As far as horses are concerned, in
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-August/038781.html
I wrote: "If the horse rental is only a secondary activity it may be
tagged horse_rental=yes (with underline, currently used once) instead of
horse:rental=yes (with colon), analogously to
On 1.9.2018 02:55, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 at 09:03, Hufkratzer <mailto:hufkrat...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I think a better alternative would be to use amenity=horse_rental,
this
is currently used 5 times, this would be analogous to
amenity=car_rental
3 months ago on the wiki page for tag leisure=horse_riding someone
recommended to use the tags horse:rental=yes and horse:type=* to
indicate that one can rent a horse there. At the time of this addition
these tags were not used, meanwhile horse:rental=yes is used once and
horse:type twice,
I
This is a continuation of the discussion titled "How to tag sports
halls?" two months ago that you can find here:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-February/035064.html
.
Meanwhile the tag leisure=sports_hall was used a bit more and I have
added some of the new examples i
I thought in OSM we do not map temporary things like people playing
something in sports halls (use of sports halls) but only verifiable
things like the permanent equipment that allows them to do it. But
anyway it is probably better to document the leisure=sports_hall tag. So
I have begun to pre
8.2.2018 09:20, Selfish Seahorse wrote:
IMHO we should suggest both, building=sports_hall for any sports hall building
and leisure=sports_hall if it is also used as a sports hall.
This seems to be a good idea to me.
We can suggest / allow both, but I if the building=* tag is mandatory
for spo
7.2.2018 19:04, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Back to the original questions, I have a severe problem with
leisure=pitch for the sports hall, it might also have pitches inside,
indoor=yes. For that, leisure=sports_centre is only slightly better,
in particular if the hall is part of a campus that is the r
Neither do I understand why building=yes is suggested in the wiki
instead of building=*, allowing more specifix building types. But I
think this is a minor problem
More complicated / important to me seem the other questions about (1.)
the mapping of indoor pitches and (2.) about the recent cha
Recently the example about how to tag a "sports hall for a school"
was changed
from building=yes + leisure=pitch + sports=multi
to building=yes + leisure=sports_centre + sports=multi,
see wiki pages for leisure=pitch and for leisure=sports_centre..There
was a small discussion about this o
39 matches
Mail list logo
