Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal Approved - boundary=aboriginal_lands

2019-03-16 Thread Alan McConchie
4:20 PM, Alan McConchie wrote: > > The voting period for boundary=aboriginal_lands has now closed, and there > were 45 votes in favor and 7 against, so the tag has now been approved. > > I created the new wiki page for the tag here: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:b

[Tagging] Feature Proposal Approved - boundary=aboriginal_lands

2018-12-13 Thread Alan McConchie
But I'm not in a hurry to start that discussion right now. Thanks to everyone who took part in this discussion and who voted on the proposal! Alan > On Nov 24, 2018, at 4:38 PM, Alan McConchie wrote: > > The tag boundary=aboriginal_lands has been discussed on-and-off for a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

2018-11-28 Thread Alan McConchie
he osm-carto github issue. Alan > On Nov 28, 2018, at 6:52 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:46 PM Alan McConchie <mailto:alan.mcconc...@gmail.com>> wrote: > I want to take your feedback with the weight and respect it deserves. I see > you vot

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

2018-11-28 Thread Alan McConchie
Paul, I want to take your feedback with the weight and respect it deserves. I see you voted against "boundary=aboriginal_lands" on the wiki because you prefer "boundary=administrative". Can you clarify more about your proposed alternative? In this thread I see you're a fan of admin_level=*, but

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

2018-11-25 Thread Alan McConchie
You are both correct that despite my attempted cleanup of the proposal, there still wasn't a good description of what these features actually are in the real world. I added a new description at the top of the page. That's my fault, sorry that I didn't include that before I started the vote. I

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

2018-11-24 Thread Alan McConchie
The tag boundary=aboriginal_lands has been discussed on-and-off for a long time in OSM. I'd like to raise the topic one last time and hopefully come to some consensus about it. The tag proposal on the wiki dates from 2008, but the original proposal was from the user Sam Vekemans (username acros

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

2016-05-02 Thread Alan McConchie
Thanks everyone for your feedback about the highway=social_path proposal. Based on the clear consensus in the email and wiki responses, we decided not to pursue a vote on the tag. We have withdrawn the proposal, and we'll move forward using a combination of highway=path, access=no, informal=yes.

[Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

2016-03-25 Thread Alan McConchie
map.org/pipermail/talk-us/2016-March/016031.html We look forward to your comments, Alan McConchie Stamen Design ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging