Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

2023-06-10 Thread Greg Troxel
Anne-Karoline Distel writes: > I would like to be able to differentiate memorials for road traffic > accidents from other memorials along a road, because I'd really like to > know how many there are. Sometimes, it will be difficult to say without > local knowledge whether it was that or maybe if

Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

2023-06-10 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
Yes, I'm aware of ghost bikes, even if only since recently. Would memorial:cause or something like that be useful? If it was a war memorial, one could use memorial:cause:wikidata then to link to the specific war or skirmish. I wouldn't link to the wikidata entry for traffic accident, just to make

Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

2023-06-10 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
On 10/06/2023 20:33, Greg Troxel wrote: Anne-Karoline Distel writes: I would like to be able to differentiate memorials for road traffic accidents from other memorials along a road, because I'd really like to know how many there are. Sometimes, it will be difficult to say without local knowled

Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

2023-06-10 Thread Greg Troxel
Anne-Karoline Distel writes: > I would say that memorial:cause=traffic_accident would leave the options > open whether the victim intended to die or not. OK but IMHO traffic_crash is better. 'accident' is an assertion of no blame, and there are messy issues of bad luck and negligence. crash i

Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

2023-06-10 Thread Marc_marc
Le 10.06.23 à 16:40, Anne-Karoline Distel a écrit : I would like to be able to differentiate memorials for road traffic accidents from other memorials along a road memorial:conflict=road_accident On a side note, I'd also like to tag memorials for pets different than for events and people. s

Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

2023-06-10 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
On 10/06/2023 20:57, Greg Troxel wrote: Anne-Karoline Distel writes: I would say that memorial:cause=traffic_accident would leave the options open whether the victim intended to die or not. OK but IMHO traffic_crash is better. 'accident' is an assertion of no blame, and there are messy iss

Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

2023-06-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 10 Jun 2023, at 17:58, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: > > I don't know if > wayside_cross is used for this in some instances, for example, which > IMHO it shouldn't be agreed. One tag I am aware of in this context is memorial=ghost_bike https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/t

[Tagging] road accident memorials

2023-06-10 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
I would like to be able to differentiate memorials for road traffic accidents from other memorials along a road, because I'd really like to know how many there are. Sometimes, it will be difficult to say without local knowledge whether it was that or maybe if the family uses "accident" as a euphem

Re: [Tagging] amenity=bbq without grill/grate ?

2023-06-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 10 Jun 2023, at 00:13, Matija Nalis > wrote: > > I think in such vandalized case it would be better tagged as > disused:amenity=bbq or abandoned:amenity=bbq there is also fireplace as tag ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@op

Re: [Tagging] Coach parking

2023-06-10 Thread Warin
On 10/6/23 00:13, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: That's what I mean, tourist busses.  I see now that there is a tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tourist_bus), but my point is that it should also be rendered with a bus/ coach symbol. Also, they are often seasonal, at least in Ireland, so

Re: [Tagging] Coach parking

2023-06-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 9 Jun 2023, at 12:56, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The difference between a coach and a bus? > > A 'coach' is intended for long distance transport - so more comfortable, > provision for luggage and possibly an on board toilet. yes, but this is a distincti

Re: [Tagging] amenity=bbq without grill/grate ?

2023-06-10 Thread Warin
On 24/2/23 00:09, Matija Nalis wrote: Recently, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:grate has been documented with some 232 uses, to map whether `leisure=firepit` and `amenity=bbq` have a grate (AKA cooking grate / grill / cooking grid). While it might be useful for `leisure=firepit`, I do

Re: [Tagging] amenity=bbq without grill/grate ?

2023-06-10 Thread Marc_marc
Le 10.06.23 à 00:08, Matija Nalis a écrit : On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:50:21 -0500, Kevin Broderick wrote: It makes sense to me if the feature is clearly intended to be a BBQ/grilling one, but the grill is missing. One such example that comes to mind is a state park with picnic tables and grill bo