On 20/04/2023 19:50, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:
> undocumented shop values
I'm using shop=screenprinting
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=screenprinting#overview
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screen_printing
a betterr value or a good value that need documentation ? :)
_
Le 17.04.23 à 15:43, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
Given how many of them are (<20 000) I think that bot edit
removing them would be a good idea.
this was also my first idea, but as a Swiss contributor is opposed
to it, the edition in question will not be done in Switzerland.
of cours
Hello,
is roof:shape=pitched an imprecise value ?
I'm not a english naative but for me it could be :
mono-pitech roof roof:shape=skillion
duble-piteched roof roof:shape=gabled
Or I miss something due to the translation ?
Regards,
Marc
___
Tagging m
Apr 19, 2023, 22:46 by elga...@agol.dk:
> Matija Nalis:
>
>> Hm, I do, but as it would be rather hard to prove (and such proof is not
>> paramount here), lets us just agree that it is how certain amount of
>> mappers use it (without trying to quantify it with subjective guesses).
>>
>
>
> I thi
Is it not too late to switch to fuel=* and drop fuel:*=*?
Marc_marc :
> Le 20.04.23 à 03:28, Matija Nalis a écrit :
> > On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:47:21 +0200, Marc_marc
> wrote:
> >> Le 19.04.23 à 14:19, Matija Nalis a écrit :
> >>> I think that my point remains that:
> >>> - one method is clear an
Le 20.04.23 à 03:28, Matija Nalis a écrit :
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:47:21 +0200, Marc_marc wrote:
Le 19.04.23 à 14:19, Matija Nalis a écrit :
I think that my point remains that:
- one method is clear and unambiguous ("fuel:lpg=no")
- one method is not clear / is ambiguous ("fuel=octane_98;diese
