Re: [Tagging] tagging the diameter of a mini-roundabout

If the actual issue is that HGV cannot pass some road, why not simply mark it as `hgv=no`? Besides being simple, it has the additional advantage that routers will actually already use it and direct HGVs somewhere where they can actually pass. Or if some lenghts of HGVs can pass, but others not,

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Replace `*:signed` suffix key with `signed:*` prefix key

On 01/02/2023 16:08, Marc_marc wrote: you can obviously just set unsigned=A;B I've got to admit, I didn't see that one coming! "unsigned=yes" is way ahead of all other "unsigned=" uses (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/unsigned#values ). However, 24 people have used "unsigned=name"

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Replace `*:signed` suffix key with `signed:*` prefix key

Hello, Le 01.02.23 à 16:47, Zeke Farwell a écrit : this is the caricature of the confusion between key and value : if a key has only one value then it is the value of another more relevant key in this

[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Replace `*:signed` suffix key with `signed:*` prefix key

Cross postig from the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-feature-proposal-replace-signed-suffix-key-with-signed-prefix-key/8459 Westnordost wrote: > Hey there. > > I’ve created a proposal to replace *:signed suffix key with signed:* > prefix key 7 >