Yes, maybe one problem is that it isn't clear if restriction:vehicle
overrules restriction+except. I like your idea of not using the except
tag but rather something like restriction:value=unrestricted. Actually
that would be the first useful combination of restriction and
restriction:vehicle th
For example this:
restriction=only_left_turn
except=bicycle;moped;psv;motorcar;
restriction:hgv:only_right_turn
would be a contradiction. The first two tags tell us that everything
except those listed by except (=hgv) should only turn left, the third
tag tells us that hgv should only turn righ
sent from a phone
> On 29 Oct 2022, at 00:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> Is the water in your "drinking fountains" chilled, or is it just the natural
> temperature of the water coming out?
there are a few “machines” that distribute chilled and carbon dioxide enriched
water for a few pen
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 at 18:23, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> you’ll have to wait a long time until the water becomes cold and can be
> drunken.
>
That one is a comment that stood out to me?
Is the water in your "drinking fountains" chilled, or is it just the
natural temperature of the water comin
On 28.10.22 22:06 easbar.m...@posteo.net wrote:
Quite obviously this isn't ideal and as far as I can tell this is the
exact reason we have the two approaches (one for excluding vehicles and
another for including them).
Historically, I'd say the reason we have two approaches is that the
"excep
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:18:01 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> The push button fountain variant is horrible, you can hardly drink from it,
> can not wash your hands, particularly the
> hand that you use to push the button, and even filling a bottle is harder
> than with the continuous flow.
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 16:43:07 +1100, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28/10/22 06:24, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> there was a discussion about this, tap was seen as a distinguishing property
>> that is yet missing. Handle is similar but not the same (handle is the thing
>> you touch, if
Le 28.10.22 à 22:06, easbar.m...@posteo.net a écrit :
Is there any reason not to do this?
it look like you said that you should use only one access tag
on a object and I don't understand why
I hope router understand restriction tags like access tag : the more
specific overwrite the more genera
Currently there are two ways to limit the vehicle types a relation
tagged as `type=restriction` (turn restriction) affects. The first one
enables the restriction for *all* vehicle types, but then excludes some,
like:
restriction=no_left_turn
except=bicycle
The second one lists the vehicles fo
Thank you Martin!
Do not worry, I have met you before and remember you as a very good person.
I have no hard feelings about that.
On 28/10/22 11:24, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 28 Oct 2022, at 10:46, Davidoskky via Tagging
wrote:
I do not like the aggressiveness in thi
Oops, that went to the list!
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi Martin: (Off-list) Thank you; a very public apology isn't always easy, but
when warranted and sincere, it puts you into the light of "a very good person,"
at least in my eyes!
Steve
> On Oct 28, 2022, at 2:24 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 28 Oct 20
sent from a phone
> On 28 Oct 2022, at 10:46, Davidoskky via Tagging
> wrote:
> I do not like the aggressiveness in this comment of yours;
I am sorry I wrote it like this, and agree it was not nice. Please accept my
apologies.
Cheers Martin
__
On 28/10/22 10:18, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
How is such a statement helpful in a tagging discussion? It can be said about
everything, I don’t tag it because I can go there to find out. If you are not
interested in tagging details, don’t engage in the discussion about these
things.
What I s
On Oct 28, 2022, at 1:18 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> On 28 Oct 2022, at 09:58, Davidoskky via Tagging
>> wrote:
>>
>> While I could be interested in whether the flow of a fountain might be
>> stopped or not, I'm not really interested in how I'd have to do that: I can
>> just go to the f
sent from a phone
> On 28 Oct 2022, at 09:58, Davidoskky via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> While I could be interested in whether the flow of a fountain might be
> stopped or not, I'm not really interested in how I'd have to do that: I can
> just go to the fountain and observe what I find.
I could
sent from a phone
> On 28 Oct 2022, at 09:58, Davidoskky via Tagging
> wrote:
> Actuator definitely provides more information and implicitly defines tap=yes.
actuator was not proposed so far, handle was, and while it is documented, it
doesn’t seem particularly helpful looking at the provide
On 28/10/22 07:43, Warin wrote:
I think the actuator is more important than the 'tap'/'valve' and
would give more information than 'tap=yes/no'.
Actuator definitely provides more information and implicitly defines
tap=yes.
This said, I don't know whether it's more important. While I could
18 matches
Mail list logo
