Re: [Tagging] Points vs Polygons

> On Apr 20, 2020, at 7:22 AM, Joseph Eisenberg > wrote: > >> we end up with most POIs [e.g. shops] added as nodes, as it appears to be >> currently the best compromise in terms of mapping efficiency, accuracy, >> complexity and editability. > > +1 +1 as well, but I do not want this to bec

Re: [Tagging] Refining heritage tag

Thanks, that's all I needed to know. Às 20:43 de 21/04/2020, Martin Koppenhoefer escreveu: by looking at the combination: you query for heritage AND ref tags in combination. No need to change the tags for this. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@ope

Re: [Tagging] Refining heritage tag

sent from a phone > On 21. Apr 2020, at 22:12, António Madeira wrote: > > If you have millions of tags like ref:"whatever", how are you going to > distinguish between them if you make a query or some kind of data reading? by looking at the combination: you query for heritage AND ref tags in

Re: [Tagging] Refining heritage tag

Yes, I know that Joseph, but the problem is not in the scheme itself, is between the tags of this scheme and the tags of other schemes. If you have millions of tags like ref:"whatever", how are you going to distinguish between them if you make a query or some kind of data reading? Since we're goi

Re: [Tagging] Tagging and rendering places without a name

On 21/4/20 6:59 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am Di., 21. Apr. 2020 um 06:03 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com >: So by the definition I see no issue of having place without a name tag, as long as it has a name :) Errr If it has a name, tag it.

Re: [Tagging] Refining heritage tag

The heritage:operator tag is needed because “operator=“ is the operator of the feature, not the operator of the heritage status. If you have an old residential building which is still in active use, the operator= is whoever manages the building now, but it might also have a heritage:operator= whic

Re: [Tagging] Refining heritage tag

On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 02:37, António Madeira wrote: > So, what's the rationale for using heritage:operator and not heritage:ref? > It's these inconsistencies that breaks my logic... > Why are the eyes of tetrapods (fish, reptiles, birds, mammals) wired backwards? Why does the recurrent larynge

Re: [Tagging] Tagging and rendering places without a name

Am Di., 21. Apr. 2020 um 06:03 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > So by the definition I see no issue of having place without a name tag, as > long as it has a name :) > > Errr If it has a name, tag it. If you don't know its name then how do you > know it is a place? > for example sett

Re: [Tagging] Tagging and rendering places without a name

Le mar. 21 avr. 2020 à 06:03, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On 21/4/20 5:31 am, Florimond Berthoux wrote: > > Hi Hidde, welcome, > > The wiki definition is « Used to indicate that a particular location is > known by a particular name, to indicate what sort of "place" it is. A place > t