The proposal looks good to me. Thanks for your effort.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 9:51 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Following the recent discussions of protective walls, I've created a page
> for barrier=berm https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dberm
>
> As it is already in use 61 t
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 19:58, Marco Predicatori
wrote:
> Marco Predicatori wrote on 11/20/19 10:03 PM:
> > Kevin Kenny wrote on 11/20/19 5:36 PM:
> >
> >>
> >> Do we perhaps need man_made=berm?
> >
> > I'm looking forward for anything more specific than embankment. Berm
> would be
> > excellent,
Following the recent discussions of protective walls, I've created a page
for barrier=berm https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dberm
As it is already in use 61 times, I didn't think we had to go through the
full RFC / voting procedure, but please correct me if I'm wrong?
As always,
Le 24.11.19 à 21:51, Kevin Kenny a écrit :
> the damaged roads are still signed with the route numbers
ref on way + relation for the real (= in use) route
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 10:15, Markus wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 at 23:19, Paul Allen wrote:
> The examples in my previous message are from 30 km/h zones in
> Switzerland, where there are no marked or signalised pedestrian
> crossings except near schools or homes for senior or handicapped
> peo
Then there is a tag as placement=transition.
This have also a kind of connection link function.
When we split a road by a traffic island we use placement=transition for
that part from middle of the road to middle of the lane.
(1) placement
--
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 at 23:19, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Depends on jurisdiction too (if I'm following all this correctly, which I may
> not be). In
> some jurisdictions, crossing is legal only at specified crossings and they
> tend to
> be frequent. In other jurisdictions, like the UK, crossing is
Marco Predicatori wrote on 11/20/19 10:03 PM:
> Kevin Kenny wrote on 11/20/19 5:36 PM:
>
>> It's neither an embankment (which is one-sided), nor a dike, which
>> holds back water. ('Dyke' in American usage means something else
>> entirely!)
>>
>> Do we perhaps need man_made=berm?
>
> I'm looking
