Another attempt at summarizing the current situation:
How should we included the direction?
- Andy Townsend suggested "Explicit start and/or finish nodes?", but I'm afraid
that's not enough to deduce the direction of complex hiking routes like this
one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/95
On Sun, 5 May 2019 at 00:18, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> I'd be happy to map it as several independent sections of steps, if
> necessary. I could even
> live with the normal-size steps not perfectly meshing with the large ones
> in a 1:3 ratio. It's
> a hard case, so I don't expect mapping it to be e
On Saturday 04 May 2019, Tobias Knerr wrote:
>
> Here's the raw data if you'd like to examine it:
> http://tobias-knerr.de/upload/Step%20Polygon%203D%20Examples/
> Please excuse the sloppy mapping, those are just intended as tests.
Thanks. I guess that means your approach relies on a one-to-one
On Sat, 4 May 2019 at 11:49, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 03.05.19 18:20, Paul Allen wrote:
> > Or this https://goo.gl/maps/TxVMau8EBrLUAaeU6
> [...]
> > You will note that there are narrow, normal-size steps within big
> > steps. It's complicated.
>
> Yeah, there's absolutely no chance to make that
On 03.05.19 19:00, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> That illustration does not show the original data so it does not tell
> very much.
Here's the raw data if you'd like to examine it:
http://tobias-knerr.de/upload/Step%20Polygon%203D%20Examples/
Please excuse the sloppy mapping, those are just intended
On 03.05.19 18:20, Paul Allen wrote:
> Or this https://goo.gl/maps/TxVMau8EBrLUAaeU6
[...]
> You will note that there are narrow, normal-size steps within big
> steps. It's complicated.
Yeah, there's absolutely no chance to make that guess from just a
polygon OR the relation originally proposed i
