Dear all!
Sorry for the earlier outburst (especially to Paul) and sorry for my quite
thoughtless follow-up proposal!
I do realize the importance of following the proper protocol, especially in a
project the size of OSM.
I'll try to get the new proposal ready hopefully this week.
>I look forwa
Me too!
Mark
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:52:51 +0100
From: Jo
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Follow-Up Proposal - voting ended - (Tramtrack
on highway)
I look forward to a new vote and will vote in favour of what you're
proposing no
I have done some slight tweaking/reorganizing of the proposal page, mostly
to separate out the rendering (which is not part of the proposal) from the
tagging (which is).
John
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:19 AM Johnparis wrote:
> FYI, I have just added a few possible renderings:
>
>
> https://wiki.
I look forward to a new vote and will vote in favour of what you're
proposing now.
Polyglot
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:29 PM Nikulainen, Jukka K <
jukka.nikulai...@helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Hello Paul, and thank you for your input!
>
> You are indeed correct that my follow-up proposal would very radic
Hello Paul, and thank you for your input!
You are indeed correct that my follow-up proposal would very radically cut
corners and be, to say the least, unorthodox. I'm certainly sorry if it
offended the sensibilities of anyone.
I can see now that it could be construed as malicious and you are ce
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 9:14 AM Nikulainen, Jukka K <
jukka.nikulai...@helsinki.fi> wrote:
It seems to me superfluous to have a new vote on the embedded_rails tag
> itself.
It seems to me that there are two possibilities here.
1) Your analysis is correct. The new proposal would meet with univer
Am Mo., 3. Dez. 2018 um 02:22 Uhr schrieb Allan Mustard :
> Yeah, I saw that, Sergio. One more puzzle to puzzle over! If anybody has
> any wisdom on this...
>
I'd like to quote from here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process in this context:
*Please note:* The outcome
FYI, I have just added a few possible renderings:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mapping_disputed_boundaries/renderings
John
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 6:23 PM Johnparis wrote:
> I have just posted an extensively revised version of my proposal on
> mapping disputed boundarie
Follow-Up Proposal on the Tramtrack on highway proposal
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tramtrack_on_highway)
First of all, thank you to all who voted and/or commented on the proposal!
The vote ended in 20 votes cast in total, with 12 approving and 8 opposing
votes. This
sent from a phone
> On 3. Dec 2018, at 07:43, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It applies to more than radar transponders...
would you add it to lighting towers as well? ;-)
Cheers, Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.o
10 matches
Mail list logo
