Re: [Tagging] nobrand

2018-08-23 Thread Warin
On 24/08/18 06:31, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 23. Aug 2018, at 18:25, Volker Schmidt wrote: In my part of Italy most, if not all have brand signs, but not "big" brands. Please be careful, when importing not to overwrite those "small" brand signs. How reliable are the i

Re: [Tagging] nobrand

2018-08-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 23. Aug 2018, at 18:25, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > In my part of Italy most, if not all have brand signs, but not "big" brands. > Please be careful, when importing not to overwrite those "small" brand signs. > How reliable are the import data anyway? +1, “pompe bianch

Re: [Tagging] delivery areas?

2018-08-23 Thread Philip Barnes
On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 18:04 +0100, seirra wrote: > not exactly possible in all those cases, but i guess it's just > incentive  > for them to modernise arguably > There are still the issues of how you verify these and again if you mapped the delivery area for every charity shop you would end up wit

Re: [Tagging] delivery areas?

2018-08-23 Thread seirra
not exactly possible in all those cases, but i guess it's just incentive for them to modernise arguably On 08/23/18 17:03, Dave F wrote: Still a minefield, still add websites imo.. Cheers DaveF On 23/08/2018 16:57, seirra wrote: I was thinking more to the tune of specific things like charity

Re: [Tagging] nobrand

2018-08-23 Thread Volker Schmidt
In my part of Italy most, if not all have brand signs, but not "big" brands. Please be careful, when importing not to overwrite those "small" brand signs. How reliable are the import data anyway? On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, 14:55 Warin, <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23/08/18 19:32, Cascafico Giova

Re: [Tagging] delivery areas?

2018-08-23 Thread Dave F
Still a minefield, still add websites imo.. Cheers DaveF On 23/08/2018 16:57, seirra wrote: I was thinking more to the tune of specific things like charity shops or smaller stores where it may not be standard On 08/23/18 16:42, Dave F wrote: If you mean things like fast food deliveries etc,

Re: [Tagging] delivery areas?

2018-08-23 Thread seirra
I was thinking more to the tune of specific things like charity shops or smaller stores where it may not be standard On 08/23/18 16:42, Dave F wrote: If you mean things like fast food deliveries etc, then tag the website, which should have such details. How horrendously confusing would the da

Re: [Tagging] delivery areas?

2018-08-23 Thread Dave F
If you mean things like fast food deliveries etc, then tag the website, which should have such details. How horrendously confusing would the database be with every delivery service was mapped? DaveF On 23/08/2018 16:34, seirra wrote: hello, i was wondering if there was any established way to r

Re: [Tagging] delivery areas?

2018-08-23 Thread Philip Barnes
Delivery areas for? Although I would expect them to be out of scope and unverifiable. Phil (trigpoint) On 23 August 2018 16:34:26 BST, seirra wrote: >hello, i was wondering if there was any established way to record >delivery areas? would i be correct to think relations would be the best > >m

[Tagging] delivery areas?

2018-08-23 Thread seirra
hello, i was wondering if there was any established way to record delivery areas? would i be correct to think relations would be the best method? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=racetrack

2018-08-23 Thread Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi
Il giorno gio, 23/08/2018 alle 15.47 +0200, Yves ha scritto: > I really fail to understand why leisure=sport_center (or else) + > sport=kart doesn't suits you. > > Yves > Because motor (and also animal) racetracks are well-defined features and it's worthwhile to distinguish them instead of put

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=racetrack

2018-08-23 Thread Yves
I really fail to understand why leisure=sport_center (or else) + sport=kart doesn't suits you. Yves Le 23 août 2018 15:01:58 GMT+02:00, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi a écrit : >Il giorno gio, 23/08/2018 alle 08.59 +0200, Yves ha scritto: >> Lorenzo, I think you're doing it wrong: if you have knowledge

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=racetrack

2018-08-23 Thread Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi
Il giorno gio, 23/08/2018 alle 08.59 +0200, Yves ha scritto: > Lorenzo, I think you're doing it wrong: if you have knowledge about > motor sport and feel the need to document a tag for those, good. > > Now there is a lot of sports where people 'race' in a wide range of > facilities. Trying to get

Re: [Tagging] nobrand

2018-08-23 Thread Warin
On 23/08/18 19:32, Cascafico Giovanni wrote: Hello, I'm going to upload 20k amenity=fuel in Italy; 5k of them are "Pompe Bianche", which means their don't belong to any brand. Which solution fits best? 1) brand=Pompe Bianche 2) brand=independent 3) brand:it=Pompe Bianche     brand=independ

[Tagging] nobrand

2018-08-23 Thread Cascafico Giovanni
Hello, I'm going to upload 20k amenity=fuel in Italy; 5k of them are "Pompe Bianche", which means their don't belong to any brand. Which solution fits best? 1) brand=Pompe Bianche 2) brand=independent 3) brand:it=Pompe Bianche brand=independent 4) nobrand=yes ...

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=racetrack

2018-08-23 Thread Yves
Lorenzo, I think you're doing it wrong: if you have knowledge about motor sport and feel the need to document a tag for those, good. Now there is a lot of sports where people 'race' in a wide range of facilities. Trying to get a one size fit all tag for everyone of them, including those you have