Re: [Tagging] Boot cleaning stations

On 30 June 2018 at 10:57, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30/06/18 10:20, Paul Allen wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:57 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Any other ideas as to words to use? >> > > Disinfection? Depends if they're just scrapers or if they include s

Re: [Tagging] Boot cleaning stations

On 30/06/18 10:20, Paul Allen wrote: On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:57 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: Any other ideas as to words to use? Disinfection?  Depends if they're just scrapers or if they include some antimicrobial/antifungal spray/dip.  T

Re: [Tagging] Boot cleaning stations

On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:57 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Any other ideas as to words to use? > Disinfection? Depends if they're just scrapers or if they include some antimicrobial/antifungal spray/dip. The UK's DEFRA says of foot and mouth disease that farmers must have approv

Re: [Tagging] Boot cleaning stations

On 29/06/18 19:50, Peter Elderson wrote: Bless you, my son. Thank you. 2018-06-29 11:45 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen >: On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: man_made=boot_cleansing ??

Re: [Tagging] Canoe route

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:37 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > When people are following the trail & arrive at a lake, would everybody use > the same route across the lake, or would you go straight across, while I > follow right round the shoreline? > > Assuming different people use different route

Re: [Tagging] Canoe route

On 30 June 2018 at 02:37, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > I tagged the route as a relation a long time ago (route=canoe) but was > updating some areas lately and came across those untagged ways again and > their invisibility began nagging at me. While I don't expect anybody to > actually use a routing

Re: [Tagging] tagging religion-based access

This right there is a major reason why it was a bad idea to allow “transportmode=accessvalue” and not always require “access:transportmode=accessvalue”… From: Mateusz Konieczny Sent: Saturday, 30 June 2018 04:36 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging

Re: [Tagging] tagging religion-based access

access=designated is meaningless and usually nonsense. It means that all access types are designated, except specified otherwise what generally is not happening. 29. Jun 2018 21:33 by cliff...@snowandsnow.us : > Another alternative, without having to introduce a

Re: [Tagging] tagging religion-based access

islam=only. 29-06-2018 21:35 tarihinde Mateusz Konieczny yazdı: > I thought about it but it is not clear that it refers to access. Also, > it would cause problems > for anybody processing popular tags (like access) and not processing > very rare new tags > (muslim). > > For example > > amenity=pl

Re: [Tagging] tagging religion-based access

Another alternative, without having to introduce a new value, would be access=designated. On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:44 AM Stephen Doerr wrote: > How about: > > amenity=place_of_worship > religion=muslim > access=adherents > > ? > > > On 29 June 2018, at 19:36, Mateusz Konieczny > wrote: > > >

Re: [Tagging] tagging religion-based access

How about: amenity=place_of_worship religion=muslim access=adherents ? On 29 June 2018, at 19:36, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: I thought about it but it is not clear that it refers to access. Also, it would cause problems for anybody processing popular tags (like access) and not processing very

Re: [Tagging] tagging religion-based access

I thought about it but it is not clear that it refers to access. Also, it would cause problemsfor anybody processing popular tags (like access) and not processing very rare new tags(muslim). For example amenity=place_of_worshipmuslim=yesreligion=muslimaccess=no would be quite unclear, with musli

Re: [Tagging] tagging religion-based access

Maybe something like access=no muslim=yes better fit the existing schemes for tagging access? > On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Mateusz Konieczny > wrote: > > I thought about muslim_only=yes tag. > > > 27. Jun 2018 12:50 by matkoni...@tutanota.com > : > > Is

Re: [Tagging] Canoe route

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:38 PM Dave Swarthout wrote: > I tagged the route as a relation a long time ago (route=canoe) but was updating some areas lately and came across those untagged ways again and their invisibility began nagging at me. While I don't expect anybody to actually use a routing se

Re: [Tagging] tagging religion-based access

I thought about muslim_only=yes tag. 27. Jun 2018 12:50 by matkoni...@tutanota.com : > > Is there some established way to tag religion-based access restrictions? > For example in Morocco only Muslims may enter a typical mosque. >__

Re: [Tagging] Canoe route

Thanks all for the feedback. I was away all day yesterday so excuse this late reply. I tagged the route as a relation a long time ago (route=canoe) but was updating some areas lately and came across those untagged ways again and their invisibility began nagging at me. While I don't expect anybody

Re: [Tagging] Boot cleaning stations

Bless you, my son. 2018-06-29 11:45 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen : > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> man_made=boot_cleansing ?? >> > > Seems about as good as anything else. Not really leisure or amenity > because it's not for fun and it's > more of a requir

Re: [Tagging] Boot cleaning stations

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > man_made=boot_cleansing ?? > Seems about as good as anything else. Not really leisure or amenity because it's not for fun and it's more of a requirement than a lifestyle choice ("I think I need to get my boots cleansed on