sent from a phone
> On 30. Mar 2018, at 12:37,
> wrote:
>
> The expectation for the default values of self_serivce and full_service will
> probably vary greatly from location to location, so it’s probably best to
> always explicitly specify both to take the guessing out of it.
I would al
> Gesendet: Freitag, 30. März 2018 um 11:29 Uhr
> Von: "Selfish Seahorse"
> An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms
>
> In my opinion, it's never too late to look for alternatives.
+1, if it is an alternative. Read:
> Gesendet: Freitag, 30. März 2018 um 11:06 Uhr
> Von: "Selfish Seahorse"
> An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms
>
> I wouldn't call a sidewalk a platform, especially because the waiting
> area on the sidewalk ofte
"wild" platform - the opposite of a built, dedicated platform structure
An example for both:
wild - a road with a grass strip and a PT post stuck in the ground,
people have to use the grass strip; over time it may have an "upgrade"
using fine gravel to compensate for the dirt revealed by
sent from a phone
> On 30. Mar 2018, at 11:06, Selfish Seahorse wrote:
>
> Furthermore,
> double tagging doesn't work if the sidewalk is called 'X Road' and the
> bus stop 'Y Square'.
in this case you’ll have a platform object and a sidewalk object that happen to
be at the same place.
chee
sent from a phone
> On 30. Mar 2018, at 08:56, Johnparis wrote:
>
>
> As has been noted elsewhere, public_transport=platform was probably not an
> ideal word choice, perhaps wait_area or some such would have been better, but
> it is what it is.
according to a dictionary, in BE platform al
I rarely do public transport tagging but found that using the new tag for a bus
stop did not render so I had to add the old version of the tag to render. I may
be in error here due to not being very familiar with the transport schemes. You
may call that tagging for the renderer but i see very li
sent from a phone
> On 29. Mar 2018, at 09:37, Topographe Fou wrote:
>
> One thing I never understood was why we have to maintain two schemas
> (probably because consensus was not reached)
it is generally hard in OSM to declare something as better, hence we always
speak about “alternatives
sent from a phone
> On 29. Mar 2018, at 03:56, Daniel Koć wrote:
>
> Double tagging is a problem too
can you please explain what you mean with “double tagging” and what the problem
is?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetma
I tag the platform as NODE with:
highway=bus_stop
public_transport=platform
bus=yes
name=
ref=
route_ref=
zone=
...
Because nodes have 1 pair of coordinates, so convenient for direct
comparison with external sources and t's easy to draw text around it with
an offset in MapCSS in JOSM,
If there i
If I got you right, you map the platform as a
public_transport=platform way and add a public_transport=platform node
in addition?
Why not tag that node public_transport=stop then? This would allow for
a clear distinction between platform and stop.
On 30 March 2018 at 11:52, Jo wrote:
> When tag
Based on the information provided here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel#Service
and what was stated in previous posts on the mailing list, I would guess that
the correct tags would be:
Only serviced by attendant:
self_service=no
full_service=yes
Self ser
When tagging platforms as ways, I wouldn't add details like name to them,
as the name would already be present on the platform node, which represents
the stop, both for rendering purposes as for being added to the route
relations.
I would only map a platform as a way, if there is tactile paving, o
> And if a tag is needed, stop vs stop_position would surely cause confusion!
If we would map a public_transport=stop node regardless of whether
there's a platform or not and if only public_transport=stop nodes
would be added to route relations then public_transport=stop_position
wouldn't be neede
> In this case it is not wrong to tag a fraction of the sidewalk as platform,
> there is dual (multipurpose) use in this case. There are several variants,
> sometimes the paving stones suggest a dedicated area over full or half of the
> width, sometimes not. Since the tags do not conflict with
I understand you can tag "self_service:no" in case of attended fuel
stations?
As Javier says, disabled people use to need attended fuel stations. In
Spain (are you from here, Javier?) some administrative areas (atonomous
communities) are moving to enforce attended fuel stations.
In other countrie
On 30 March 2018 08:50:07 BST, "Javier Sánchez Portero"
wrote:
>El vie., 30 mar. 2018 8:a
>I think this is important for disabled drivers to have to go down the
>car
>to fill or not.
>
Not really, at self service filling stations the cashier will fill the car for
disabled drivers.
Phil (tr
El vie., 30 mar. 2018 8:54, escribió:
> While it has never been used before, the logical key to me would be
> self_service:conditional following the usual rules for conditional keys.
>
I agree. It will require only a minor change in the conditional
restrictions wiki.
Javier
>
__
While it has never been used before, the logical key to me would be
self_service:conditional following the usual rules for conditional keys.
At least you can choose during the day if you fuel by your self or not. So I
would treat it as not self service during the day.
I consider this a
El vie., 30 mar. 2018 8:13, Stephan Knauss
escribió:
> Hello Dave,
>
> As this is a thing country specific, people typically expect the norm. So
> no need to tag this explicitly.
>
> Question is how to tag it.
>
> self_service sounds like the right key to tag exceptions from the norm. It
> can al
Hello Dave,
As this is a thing country specific, people typically expect the norm. So no
need to tag this explicitly.
Question is how to tag it.
self_service sounds like the right key to tag exceptions from the norm. It can
also be used with the same meaning for example for car wash. These com
El jue., 29 mar. 2018 23:55, Graeme Fitzpatrick
escribió:
>
>
>
> On 30 March 2018 at 05:34, Javier Sánchez Portero
> wrote:
>
>> In my area there are still some serviced stations and I consider this an
>> added value.
>>
>
> Definitely!
>
> Question re another variation thanks.
>
> We have a s
22 matches
Mail list logo
