2017-12-01 16:50 GMT+01:00, Tom Pfeifer :
> One solution would be landcover=*, being orthogonal to landuse, however that
> is rejected to be
> rendered in the carto/main style.
it is _currently_ rejected to be rendered in osm-carto, I still
encourage people to use the tag, if the main style conti
2017-12-01 11:14 GMT+01:00, Jean-Marc Liotier :
> the purpose of the commons are
> the same, even though there is no legal definition in Senegal while
> there is one in Britain.
what makes it require some judgement/assesment wrt to the term
"rights", as the wiki says (coming from a British/Europe
On 01.12.2017 12:47, Marc Gemis wrote:
There was a long discussion on the Dutch forum awhile back [1]
I tried to convince them not to use landuse=village_green for hedges,
plants, flowers etc. in town centers.
On 01.12.2017 11:03, Simon Poole wrote:
> A large number of landuse=village_green se
There was a long discussion on the Dutch forum awhile back [1]
I tried to convince them not to use landuse=village_green for hedges,
plants, flowers etc. in town centers. I believe the consensus was they
would still use it for that purpose, especially, since the
UK-community also does this [2]
So
On 30 November 2017 at 22:45, Daniel Koć wrote:
> While making some cleaning in osm-carto we have found that leisure=common
> and leisure=village_green are probably not clear enough to show them any
> more. They both have deep roots in British law and history and are
> frequently misused, as far a
The tag _leisure=common_ is used quite a lot in African villages where they
have a large flat open space, ungrassed. It is used for communal gatherings,
football games and markets. If you wish to deprecate the tag then what are you
suggesting is the correct tag for this?
>From Wiki _Tag:leisure
Strictly speaking "common land" in England and Wales is a kind of access
qualifier, and doesn't imply anything about land use, surface covering
or ownership. It's a bit like "public footpath", in that the rights are
(to some extent) enshrined in law.
So leisure=common would indeed be technically
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 01:33:16 +0100
Daniel Koć wrote:
>
> land over which the public has general rights of use for certain
> leisure activities
That is exactly how I use leisure=common in Senegal: usually a
block-sized area in town, which has no dedicated purpose but to provide
some urban empty spa
A large number of landuse=village_green seem to be due to an import in
the Czech Republic, where is has been used for essentially any grassy
area. Lots of the leisure=common seem to be actually be leisure=park
with the exception of the HOT helicopter "landing areas". I would
suggest that maybe fix
