Re: [Tagging] tower types, cooling towers etc.

2017-11-09 Thread Christian Müller
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I just noticed that the tagman_made=cooling_tower is deprecated. > The template says the reason is on the deprecated features list, but actually > there is no reasoning there. +1. People are moving forward too fast without documentin

Re: [Tagging] tower types, cooling towers etc.

2017-11-09 Thread Dave Swarthout
@Martin, I'm not sure of the meaning of your question. I am aware of the use of man_made=water_tower for example and think it might be better to use the top level tag man_made=tower followed by: tower:type=water_storage (or water_tower) But it seems the two methods are already in use, namely, usi

Re: [Tagging] [Proposal] Boundary=marker

2017-11-09 Thread Greg Troxel
henkevdb writes: > Proposal to change > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dboundary_stone into > Boundary=marker and if it is historic, simply add historic=yes and/or > add marker as value on this wikipage -> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:boundary Some issues to cons

Re: [Tagging] winter tyres

2017-11-09 Thread Michal Fabík
On 1.11.2017 11:50, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Hi, sorry for the long pause. Ok, following Warin's suggestion: > https://www.sicurauto.it/upload/news_/8684/img/2038-cartelli sperimentali-pneumatici-invernali.png motor_vehicle:conditional=winter_equipment @ (Nov 15-Apr 15) > http://www.rmastr

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 2)

2017-11-09 Thread Moritz
Nakaner just commented on his user page So, wie es aussieht, ist es jetzt deutlich besser. Die verbleibenden Tagänderungen sind in meinen Augen ausreichend gut begründet Which translates to How it looks like now is way better. The remaining changes of tags are to my mind sufficiently explaine

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 2)

2017-11-09 Thread Moritz
Am 2017-11-09 18:12, schrieb Viking: About the split, if someone wants to go in that direction, he can start a new proposal focused on that point. I think that we all agree, don't we? You are right, I think there is still the part 3 of the proposal and afterwards we can think about a new

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 2)

2017-11-09 Thread Viking
> It seems that at least some of them commented on the new proposal. > One feedback I got via mail was that we should split hydrants and > suction_points, as they are in Germany different things ;) I answered every comment in discussion page. The aim now is to keep the focus on new tags. About th

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 2))

2017-11-09 Thread Moritz
Moritz, did you contact individually people who opposed the previous proposal? Yes, I left a comment on every discussion page. It seems that at least some of them commented on the new proposal. One feedback I got via mail was that we should split hydrants and suction_points, as they are in

[Tagging] tower types, cooling towers etc.

2017-11-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
I just noticed that the tag man_made=cooling_tower is deprecated. The template says the reason is on the deprecated features list, but actually there is no reasoning there. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcooling_tower The suggested alternative tagging with man_made=tower is _c