I agree it's confusing. On one reading of the wiki man_made=water _tap with
amenity=drinking_water would mean the exact same as man_made=water_tap +
drinking_water=yes.
On the other hand I think amenity=drinking_water should be reserved for
things primarily intended for direct water consumption, l
2017-11-02 19:15 GMT+01:00 Éric Gillet :
> 2017-11-02 15:50 GMT+01:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira :
>
>> Is there a way to represent emergency phones (emergency=phone) which
>> have a blinking/flashing light (so they can be identified at night,
>> with fog, etc), please?
>>
>
> Maybe you can reuse the l
2017-11-03 1:00 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> Some think that the use of these 2 tags together is a good thing.
>
> man_made=water _tap with amenity=drinking_water
>
I don't see a problem, as long as the water is indeed potable.
Cheers,
Martin
__
Hi,
Some think that the use of these 2 tags together is a good thing.
man_made=water _tap with amenity=drinking_water
There reasons? I think are;
1) indicates potable.
2) amenity=drinking_water includes tap .. so why not use both tags?
-
My answers;
1) man_made=wate
Hello,
Le 02. 11. 17 à 19:15, Éric Gillet a écrit :
> light:blinking=yes
light:blinking doesn't exist yet.
so maybe it's better to use this one
light:flash=yes (80 uses)
Regards,
Marc
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.op
2017-11-02 15:50 GMT+01:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira :
> Is there a way to represent emergency phones (emergency=phone) which
> have a blinking/flashing light (so they can be identified at night,
> with fog, etc), please?
>
Maybe you can reuse the lit=yes tag. It's not exactly the original meaning
of
Is there a way to represent emergency phones (emergency=phone) which
have a blinking/flashing light (so they can be identified at night,
with fog, etc), please?
If not, what would be a good tag for this? (something like blinking_light=yes)
___
Tagging ma
