But unlike a real pub (a "café" in Dutch and French - or "bruine
kroeg"), you can get a decent meal in a brasserie, or ice cream,
pancakes around 4pm etc. So the focus is much more on food imho.
So are you suggesting that amenity=pub; food=yes is better ?
the description tag is very general, but
Thomas Bertels wrote:
> A brasserie is "a small, informal restaurant that serves beer
> and wine as well as simple food"
> So should it be tagged as
> - amenity=restaurant cuisine=brasserie (emphasis on food)?
> - amenity=pub food=yes (emphasis on drinks)?
> - amenity=brasserie?
For me, a "
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 03:27:45PM +0200, Daniel Koć wrote:
> W dniu 07.08.2017 o 13:16, Richard pisze:
>
> >Some rivers have waterway relations which could be used to make some
> >classification?
>
> What do you mean?
simply having a waterway relation means the river is a larger one worth
to l
* Mark Wagner [170807 20:45]:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:37:52 +0200
> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>> On 7. Aug 2017, at 10:51, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>>> I agree that some sort of river classification might be helpful but
>>> you cannot expect a mapper standing before a river to first analyse
>>> a
W dniu 07.08.2017 o 20:45, Mark Wagner pisze:
At least in developed countries, you can get an idea of a road's
classification in the network just by looking at how it's constructed.
I can stand beside Sprague Avenue, see that it's a one-way road with
five lanes, and judge that it's probably a pr
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:37:52 +0200
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 7. Aug 2017, at 10:51, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> >
> > I agree that some sort of river classification might be helpful but
> > you cannot expect a mapper standing before a river to first analyse
> > a large
sent from a phone
> On 7. Aug 2017, at 10:51, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> I agree that some sort of river classification might be helpful but you
> cannot expect a mapper standing before a river to first analyse a large
> dataset before they can find the right classification tag - that would
> to
sent from a phone
> On 6. Aug 2017, at 23:42, Colin Smale wrote:
>
> We have a hierarchy of "importance" for roads, why not for waterways as well?
> It's like we have nothing between motorway (river) and unclassified (stream).
it's more like having service for streams and not differentiatin
sent from a phone
> On 6. Aug 2017, at 23:19, Richard wrote:
>
> But what you ask for seems like tagging for the renderer.
yes, but not in the way this sentence is usually used: he asks for helping the
renderer by giving more (correct) information explicitly, rather than
distorting the da
W dniu 07.08.2017 o 13:16, Richard pisze:
the difference though is that in many countries every road has a roadsign
identifying it as some kind of primary - secondary road type, also having
legal implications someplaces.
That doesn't seem common for rivers and I am wondering if this information
W dniu 07.08.2017 o 10:51, Frederik Ramm pisze:
You are welcome to write a renderer that computes these orders from the
existing data but please don't expect or entice mappers to compute this
and add the tags (or worse, entice people to write scripts that compute
these orders and add the tags to
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:33:55PM +0200, Daniel Koć wrote:
> W dniu 06.08.2017 o 23:19, Richard pisze:
>
> >The width is fine for many small rivers where mapping riverbanks would be
> >a nonsense and should be respected by the renderer.
> >But what you ask for seems like tagging for the renderer.
I typically tag them as amenity=restaurant.
I also add a tag restaurant:type:NL or horeca:type:NL (I know both are
bad, undocumented tags) in which I place the "type" as indicated on
the building.
There are so many variations possible taverne, brasserie, eetcafé,
bistro, restaurant-café etc. which
A brasserie is "a small, informal restaurant that serves beer and wine
as well as simple food" (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/brasserie)
In Belgium, a brasserie always serves both drinks and food, it's a
combination of a restaurant and a pub/café/bar.
So should it be tagged as
- amenity=restau
Sadly, neither of these stream orders are correlated with the discharge of the
river, which could then send a wrong impression on the rendered map if they
would indicate the river width.
Cheers
On 6 August 2017 17:30:20 CEST, "Daniel Koć" wrote:
>W dniu 06.08.2017 o 13:32, Richard pisze:
>> as
Hi,
On 08/06/2017 08:06 PM, Daniel Koć wrote:
> For general rendering on low zoom I would probably use combination of
> classic and Strahler/Shreve.
> order:classic=1 means only that this river goes to the sea, which is
> more important than the river with higher number, but
> order:strahler/order
16 matches
Mail list logo
