Unless the word is "St." for Saint in English where there is no evidence
that the full spelling is ever, ever used.
And including the word "Township" in the name may also be considered
"tagging for the renderer". This place sounds like it is a "township" by
virtue of some act of incorporation and
yes.
name = full name without abbreviation
official_name = like in government use.
--
Le 25. 07. 17 à 03:16, Albert Pundt a écrit :
> I know abbreviated names are frowned upon in OSM, but what about places
> like towns where the abbreviation is part of the official name? For
> example, Mt. Leban
I know abbreviated names are frowned upon in OSM, but what about places
like towns where the abbreviation is part of the official name? For
example, Mt. Lebanon Township in Allegheny County, PA (near Pittsburgh). It
is officially, in all government documents, named "Mt. Lebanon" (though the
postal
I commented in one of his changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50438835
2017-07-24 15:16 GMT-03:00 SwiftFast :
> EzekielT asked me to post the following in the mailing list:
>
> I've never done intentional vandalism; and all of those edit problems
> were misunderstandings from ove
EzekielT asked me to post the following in the mailing list:
I've never done intentional vandalism; and all of those edit problems
were misunderstandings from over a year ago. I'd already explained to
SomeoneElse from the DWG about those misunderstandings a long time ago;
and everything was alread
User has replied on their talk page. I get the impression they're
cooperative but don't know the guidelines. Could someone more
experienced with tag creation explain to them what's fine and what's
not?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:EzekielT
___
The user seems to have some history with bad edits[1]. Some of the tags
could be helpful. (e.g. public microwaves in campuses), but it appears
this user is not familiar with OSM etiquette and just goes ahead and
edits as he/she sees fit without discussing. There's also a chance of
intentional vanda
On 7/24/17 1:14 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 7/24/17 1:04 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>>
>> I wonder what to do here.
> you could contact him directly and ask him what he is trying to do, and
> attempt to gently dissuade him.
>
> if he is not amenable to reason, well, that's why we have the DWG.
follo
On 7/24/17 1:04 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> There is a user creating a large amount of strange wiki pages for
> "amenities" like
> television, microwave, washing machine, stool, seat, plant, fridge,
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dstool
>
> or tiny perishable objects like natural
Talk to this user to explain that it's fun but must be stopped and reverted.
He do it itself... or somebody 'll do it for him and request a lockout.
Le 24. 07. 17 à 19:04, Tom Pfeifer a écrit :
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dstool
_
There is a user creating a large amount of strange wiki pages for "amenities"
like
television, microwave, washing machine, stool, seat, plant, fridge,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dstool
or tiny perishable objects like natural=flower
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:n
11 matches
Mail list logo
