On Friday 05 August 2016 02:15:35 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > 3. There is a service, due to operational reasons, identified by two
> > different numbers. However, the two different numbers are used in
> > different segment of the service, but in fact, they belongs to the same
> > service (i.e.
On 13-Sep-16 02:22 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
How do I tag "designated horse parking", such as:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4398390415/history
I don't see anything suitable at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Riding
The German osm riding page has amenity=hitching_post - 20 odd uses i
How do I tag "designated horse parking", such as:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4398390415/history
I don't see anything suitable at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Riding
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstr
W dniu 12.09.2016 15:31, Dave F napisał(a):
I'd say use primary_link as it involves less typing, but both are
equal in meaning & standing.
We could tag "any tag we like", but while the meaning may be the same,
in practice only one is used and the other one is not.
That's the first class - y
On 12/09/2016 01:15, Daniel Koć wrote:
W dniu 11.09.2016 17:53, Dave F napisał(a):
Well, OK. 'Classification' then (which gives indications to who can
use it).
I still hold my position. Classification doesn't tell who can use it,
rather the purpose.
Hmm.. 'Motorway', when first mapped, had