[Tagging] Does disused:railway=* require railway=disused?

Hello, there. I've been told in a JOSM ticket (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/12866#comment:2) that the wiki states that disused:railway=* requires railway=disused, and, indeed, the wiki says that (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:railway). I don't understand why as, AFAIK

Re: [Tagging] How to tag: public lands that are accessed by permit?

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > yes, it fits well if you know what the situation is, but without > documentation you don't know whether this is only supposed to be used for > places where permits are generally granted, or if it is also used for > places where you nee

Re: [Tagging] State parks and state forests: specific tagging question, general mapping philosophy

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > I don't see (a) that everything is ready for it > nor (b) that it would require any downtime. For example I'm running > osm-carto with hstore and using views so I don't have to modify the > style; but it hasn't been shown whether that would

Re: [Tagging] State parks and state forests: specific tagging question, general mapping philosophy

@Kevin; I'm glad to see someone is interested in clearing up the mess in the Adirondack Park and sorry to hear about your frustration concerning rendering of the protected areas in NYS. Although I no longer hike in that area because I moved to Alaska in 1983 I have a strong and continuing interest

Re: [Tagging] State parks and state forests: specific tagging question, general mapping philosophy

Hi, On 07/27/2016 02:36 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > The part that I can't do anything about is getting hstore activated on > the main rendering database. That's a matter of turning a switch - > osmosis, osm2pgsql, mapnik, everything is ready for it - but this > problem isn't important enough for the

Re: [Tagging] State parks and state forests: specific tagging question, general mapping philosophy

Hi, On 07/27/2016 06:23 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > Even though I say it who shouldn't, I do a pretty fair job as a > "consumer" of OSM data myself. It only increases my frustration to know > that we could have an information-dense rendering like > https://kbk.is-a-geek.net/catskills/karl.html?la=42.

Re: [Tagging] State parks and state forests: specific tagging question, general mapping philosophy

On 07/27/2016 05:52 AM, Andy Townsend wrote: On 27/07/2016 03:59, Kevin Kenny wrote: How many more years must I wait, then, before they will become visible on any of the tile layers on openstreetmap.org? If it hadn't been a couple or three years already, I'd be more patient. A New Yorker would f

Re: [Tagging] State parks and state forests: specific tagging question, general mapping philosophy

On 27/07/2016 03:59, Kevin Kenny wrote: How many more years must I wait, then, before they will become visible on any of the tile layers on openstreetmap.org ? If it hadn't been a couple or three years already, I'd be more patient. A New Yorker would find it astonishin

Re: [Tagging] How to tag: public lands that are accessed by permit?

On 7/27/2016 7:15 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2016-07-27 10:54 GMT+02:00 moltonel >: I went with access=permit at the time: it seemed to fit very well, without needing a big discussion thread :p yes, it fits well if you know what the situation is, but w

Re: [Tagging] State parks and state forests: specific tagging question, general mapping philosophy

2016-07-26 21:11 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kenny : > "boundary=protected_area" does not render. I don't expect, given the > amount of progress toward rendering it in the last two or three years, that > I'm going to see rendering of protected areas on any maps I don't produce. I think there is no general

Re: [Tagging] State parks and state forests: specific tagging question, general mapping philosophy

Kevin Kenny wrote: > How many more years must I wait, then, before they will become visible > on any of the tile layers on openstreetmap.org? This is going to sound snarky and it isn't meant as such, but: the number of years until you send a pull request to openstreetmap-carto. :) But remember t

Re: [Tagging] How to tag: public lands that are accessed by permit?

2016-07-27 10:54 GMT+02:00 moltonel : > I went with access=permit at the time: it seemed to fit very well, > without needing a big discussion thread :p > yes, it fits well if you know what the situation is, but without documentation you don't know whether this is only supposed to be used for pl

Re: [Tagging] How to tag: public lands that are accessed by permit?

On 21 July 2016 12:31:42 GMT+01:00, m...@chrisfleming.org wrote: > >In my view access=permit seems like they way to go. Having >access=private with permit=something adds to the complexity without >adding value. Keep it simple. Joining this discussion late, but just as another datapoint, this use