Hi,
On 03/07/2016 07:54 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>> Just imagine what would happen if
>> someone took it upon them to actually list all the products sold at a
>> supermarket. And update that once a week.
> I see no problem with that except that anybody would quickly give up and
> overall wast
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 02:39:52 +0100
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Just imagine what would happen if
> someone took it upon them to actually list all the products sold at a
> supermarket. And update that once a week.
I see no problem with that except that anybody would quickly give up and
overall waste ti
Thanks Frederik, that makes sense to me.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/07/2016 06:47 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
>> Is e.g. brand for shop=car, amenity=fuel, amenity=bank acceptable ?
>
> The word "brand" has its root in the process of marking live animals
> with
On 7/03/2016 12:39 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 03/07/2016 12:11 AM, Warin wrote:
So you would prefer
sells=motorcycle;yamaha
I don't think that OSM is the right place to encode an ontology of
things. That there are different types of bread and different brands of
motorcycles, and that a "Y
Hi,
On 03/07/2016 06:47 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
> Is e.g. brand for shop=car, amenity=fuel, amenity=bank acceptable ?
The word "brand" has its root in the process of marking live animals
with a glowing "branding iron" to identify their owner.
I understand "brand" in OSM as a tag that we apply to a
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Frankly, with OSM not being a business directory, I don't even think the
> particulars about what a shop sells should be mapped, except perhaps in
> some limited cases
Frederik, please list those cases, as I want to understand what you
see as
I truly find this proposal to be logical and well thought out. However, I
think that there may be better ways to pursue these goals other than
replacing the millions of ways on OSM tagged with the current schema. That
said, I think there is room to add new tags that serves a similar purpose
to what
Hi. Please take a look for this proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AssociatedAddress_(new)
I'm sorry if it is double message.
--
Best regards,
Alexandr (LLlypuk82)
sani...@yandex.by
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https:
On 02.03.2016 17:42, Simon Poole wrote:
> While the abandoned proposal seems to be more complete and I can't
> say anything about the other variant because of the lacking
> documentation, I don't really care either way, it would simply
> make easier if we could come to some consensus on what the
Hi,
On 03/07/2016 12:11 AM, Warin wrote:
> So you would prefer
> sells=motorcycle;yamaha
I don't think that OSM is the right place to encode an ontology of
things. That there are different types of bread and different brands of
motorcycles, and that a "Yamaha" is a motorcycle while a "Hovis" is a
You obviously did a lot of work in preparing your proposal and for that I
thank you Alberto. However, I'm afraid I have to agree with Tom. To
redefine the current highway tagging structure to the extent you suggest
would be next to impossible given the free-thinking nature of many mappers,
and any
On 7/03/2016 2:32 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 06.03.2016 um 15:35 schrieb Simon Poole :
* for a small number of well defined and documented sub-keys it is not
particular nice, but can be tolerated.
+1, I'd also like to see this as a generally rare exception and not
In the UK you can add a fourth one to that list - where Royal Mail think
you are, for the purposes of addressing post. Doesn't correspond to any of
the first three options.
This is similar in some pats of the US. USPS addresses are completely
different from the other three.
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at
In the UK you can add a fourth one to that list - where Royal Mail think
you are, for the purposes of addressing post. Doesn't correspond to any
of the first three options.
On 2016-03-06 16:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
>
>> Am 06.03.2016 um 11:28 schrieb moltonel :
>>
>>
sent from a phone
> Am 06.03.2016 um 15:35 schrieb Simon Poole :
>
> * for a small number of well defined and documented sub-keys it is not
> particular nice, but can be tolerated.
+1, I'd also like to see this as a generally rare exception and not as a good
way to generally structure the i
sent from a phone
> Am 06.03.2016 um 11:28 schrieb moltonel :
>
> City limits rarely match the limits of urban areas. On one extreme there are
> multi-city agglomerations, on the other there are rural areas that are inside
> cities, for example in France where there is no "no-city's land", ev
`sells:bread:sourdough:loaf:hovis=yes`
It’s probably worth mentioning that we also can’t support a tagging scheme like
this in iD presets.
We don’t have a UI for free tagging things that go in the key part of the tag.
(It’s the same problem with `seamark:` namespaced tags, which we also can’t
s
It really really really really is not a good idea to pollute the key
name space with an indeterminate number of sub-keys* instead of placing
values in the, no surprise there, value part. it essentially guarantees
that nobody will ever evaluate any of the information and even if the
proposal would
On 6 March 2016 08:47:36 GMT+00:00, Ralph Aytoun
wrote:
>My personal opinion is that this is getting totally out of hand.
>Shops pay a lot of money to advertise their wares and you are stepping
>in
>and trying to do commercial marketing for free.
>Not only that but who is going to maintain thi
On 5 March 2016 21:13:48 GMT+00:00, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>> Am 05.03.2016 um 15:25 schrieb Alberto :
>>
>> OSM does not establish the difference between inter-urban (rural)
>roads and urban roads (comprising mostly avenues and streets).
>
>
>there are tags in use that allow to make this
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 08:47:36 -
"Ralph Aytoun" wrote:
> My personal opinion is that this is getting totally out of hand.
> Shops pay a lot of money to advertise their wares and you are
> stepping in and trying to do commercial marketing for free.
Nobody is forcing anybody to map what is sold.
It depends on the kind of shops.
E.g vehicle related shops, typically have 1 or only a few brands. The
listof brands fixed for longer periods.
I think the same is true for some fashion outlets where you can only
find a collection from a limited number of brand.
I wouldn't start adding brands to a
Am Montag, den 29.02.2016, 12:01 +0100 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:21:44 +0100
> David Marchal wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello, there.
> >
> > I wondered: I saw the' tributary' role on some waterway relations;
> > while I understand its usage — to represent the fact that a
> > wa
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This an attempt to subvert the present creation of other tag/s (by stealth)
> that, in my view, can be much better.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sells
One problem I see at this moment, is that there
My personal opinion is that this is getting totally out of hand.
Shops pay a lot of money to advertise their wares and you are stepping in
and trying to do commercial marketing for free.
Not only that but who is going to maintain this information? Shops rotate
their stocks on a seasonal basis. T
I have made some alteration that should address this?
It might be more clear that it is a property key of something else .. like the
height key.
Description:
description of items sold by a shop or some amenities.
Proposal:
An indication of what is sold by a shop or some amenities.
Tagging:
26 matches
Mail list logo
