Re: [Tagging] Delete not marked walking routes?

2015-09-20 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 20/09/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > what about a map that shows the route and is placed on the ground, eg at the > start of the route (let's say the map is in the public domain)? To me that's a (partially) waymarked trail and is absolutely fine. > Or signposted QR codes? This has recentl

Re: [Tagging] Delete not marked walking routes?

2015-09-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 20.09.2015 um 15:07 schrieb Dave F. : > > A route should be verifiable on the ground. > > Verifiable via publication (paper, website etc) should not be used as a > reason to add to OSM. what about a map that shows the route and is placed on the ground, eg at the star

Re: [Tagging] Delete not marked walking routes?

2015-09-20 Thread Dave F.
A route should be verifiable on the ground. Verifiable via publication (paper, website etc) should not be used as a reason to add to OSM. Where would you stop? Would you, for instance, allow someone who writes an internet blog 'Where I walk my dog' & displays a GPX of the route? As Frederick h

Re: [Tagging] Delete not marked walking routes?

2015-09-20 Thread moltonel
On 20 September 2015 11:54:00 GMT+01:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >> Case b) Frequent use and 'the best' route. This would be contentious. > >So every mapper may add his favourite route? That bothers me as well. Even if we restricted ourselves to only published routes, we'd open ourselves to

Re: [Tagging] Delete not marked walking routes?

2015-09-20 Thread Marc Gemis
Please remember that the routes from books etc. are often loops, focussing on walking in one's spare time, not on moving from A to B Warin61 wrote: > >- the map user would benefit from the indication of 'the best' route. >- for my cases there are no near by documented routes. > > > ___

Re: [Tagging] large roof garden

2015-09-20 Thread Richard
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:02:13PM +0200, Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 14.09.2015 23:17, Richard wrote: > > if it has an assigned level=* as part of the building than that would > > be better than location=rooftop. Or maybe both together. > > Both together would also be an option. The thing is, I expe

Re: [Tagging] Delete not marked walking routes?

2015-09-20 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:56:00 +1000 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Case a) Verifiable by documentation. Published (medium does not > matter). I'd think few would argue this case. I am sure that not every single published route is worth mapping. Maybe there are unique cases but certainly no

Re: [Tagging] Delete not marked walking routes?

2015-09-20 Thread Warin
On 20/09/2015 4:45 PM, Pee Wee wrote: OnTalk-BE this question was asked. Since this is a question that applies not only to Belgium I thought it would be good to raise the question here. User Escada asked the same

Re: [Tagging] Delete not marked walking routes?

2015-09-20 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 09/20/2015 08:45 AM, Pee Wee wrote: > Also on the Dutch forum > this question was > asked. Much to my surprise there seem to be quite a few that think it is > OK to have these non way marked routes in OSM. Main argument is that > there