On behalf of the proposal author, I would like to introduce you to the
following proposal, which intends to formalize the area:highway tag:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area
The idea to use areas tagged as area:highway in addition to the highway
way is almost 5 year
From my experience, department stores allow you to pay separately in each
department, but don't generally require you to do so, except for items that
are both valuable and easily concealed, such as jewelry.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only lig
Maybe some places, but I would not assume that everywhere works that way.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 30, 2015, at 6:51 PM, John Eldredge wrote:
>
> With the added connotation that ONLY the designated transportation methods
> are allowed.
>
> --
> John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
>
Saying "allowed" as the prefix would be less ambiguous than "access", as
many people are likely to interpret "access" as "is access possible".
After all, referring to a location as "not wheelchair-accessible" means
that it difficult to get to via wheelchair, not that wheelchair use is
forbidde
What's a 'trolltag'?
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 31/08/2015 8:58 AM, John Willis wrote:
On Aug 31, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
uilding=commercial is quite suspect.
To me, there are 2 basic types of mixed use buildings.
mixed_use_urban
And
mixed_use_house
There are so many different combinations of retail, residential,
> > On Aug 29, 2015, at 12:08 AM, Andrew MacKinnon
wrote:
> >
> > Gardiner is still highway=motorway
>
> If the construction doesn't impact the maxspeed, the lanes, the
alignment, nor the classification of the road - then its not really under
construction. If the road changes alignment for a long
> On Aug 29, 2015, at 12:08 AM, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
>
> Gardiner is still highway=motorway
If the construction doesn't impact the maxspeed, the lanes, the alignment, nor
the classification of the road - then its not really under construction. If the
road changes alignment for a long time
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> uilding=commercial is quite suspect.
To me, there are 2 basic types of mixed use buildings.
mixed_use_urban
And
mixed_use_house
There are so many different combinations of retail, residential, hotel, and
commercial (and in come c
Here in Nashville, TN, USA, back when the department stores were all
located in the central business district, they indeed tended to be
multistory. Starting in the 1970s, the downtown department stores either
went out of business or migrated to the suburbs, where land was cheaper,
and one-to-t
With the added connotation that ONLY the designated transportation methods
are allowed.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
On August 27, 2015 3
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Andrew MacKinnon
wrote:
> Is there any way to tag roads as being under construction but which
> are not closed to traffic?
construction=minor. Also, if known, consider access:lanes=yes|no|no (vary
as appropriate) as well.
___
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 11:43:34 -0300
Severin Menard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to tag properly buildings mixing residential and
> commercial uses (typically shops on the basement opening on the
> street)? Building=commercial is defined as "A building where
> non-specific commercial activities
Hi,
Is there a way to tag properly buildings mixing residential and commercial
uses (typically shops on the basement opening on the street)?
Building=commercial is defined as "A building where non-specific commercial
activities take place", that does not describe what are the other
activities taki
On 30/08/2015 9:07 PM, johnw wrote:
On Aug 30, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
indeed the buildings are just buildings (eventually with own names,
start dates and other attributes) , it's not them to put the name for
the "whole" complex on. But I
> On Aug 30, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> indeed the buildings are just buildings (eventually with own names, start
> dates and other attributes) , it's not them to put the name for the "whole"
> complex on. But IMHO it's neither a landuse object, it's an object with a
sent from a phone
> Am 30.08.2015 um 01:27 schrieb John Willis :
>
> Why should the pattern for mapping industrial complexes be any different for
> residential? Civic/government? Schools? Hospitals? None of the buildings in
> any of those examples, when grouped together into a named complex,
sent from a phone
> Am 30.08.2015 um 01:27 schrieb John Willis :
>
> A mall sits on one named landuse=retail.
a mall is retail landuse
the tag for the mall is shop=mall
> A factory sits on landuse=industrial.
a factory is industrial landuse
the tag is man_made=works
...
> A "gated co
18 matches
Mail list logo
