Re: [Tagging] Disputed area

2015-07-22 Thread johnw
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > One thing that perhaps might want to be captured in other disputes is > what happens when one country actually occupies and controls the > disputed territory. There, there's a de facto border and a claim. The Senkaku Island dispute would m

Re: [Tagging] Telecoms Tagging

2015-07-22 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Tim, Thank you for such a call. I can't develop as much as I would since I'm really busy this month. Can you take care of this proposal please ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ Proposed

Re: [Tagging] bridge AND embankment

2015-07-22 Thread Eric SIBERT
Although I agree that such combination is suspicious... > 250 in France A rough evaluation for France give me 200k ways with bridge=yes. So about 1 error each 1000 bridges. Not such a big issue. My 0,02 €. Eric ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@op

[Tagging] bridge AND embankment

2015-07-22 Thread Volker Schmidt
By chance I have detected that amny mappers use this combination on highways: ways con bridge=* embankment=yes To see an example search in Northern Italy: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/axW When I saw the first example I thought of an accidental mapping error, but the Overpass Turbo revealed that thi

[Tagging] Telecoms Tagging

2015-07-22 Thread Tim Waters
Hi folks, I'm working on a project to map telecommunication features with the aim to better understand what "The Internet" means geographically and physically. I have started collating a number of the various telecoms features to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Telecoms The catego

Re: [Tagging] Disputed area

2015-07-22 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 07/21/2015 11:10 PM, Arch Arch wrote: > I think it would be better to create separate relations for disputed > territories instead of introducing new roles. Your approach would break > many existing applications. > > There's already a proposal: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Propo

Re: [Tagging] Disputed area

2015-07-22 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
But that proposal intends to encircle disputed territories which is different from specifying disputed parts of otherwise OK boundaries in a normal boundary relation. I have already considered the impact on current tools and my solution is to introduce a new relation type: boundary=administrative_

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

2015-07-22 Thread John Willis
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 22, 2015, at 4:03 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > ships > or castles are common in Europe, its the theme, and it would be good to > separate that > from the functional category. I guess that is a good way to look at it. > BTW, 'mountain' is a bit misleading in the e

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

2015-07-22 Thread Tom Pfeifer
John Willis wrote on 2015-07-22 03:47: On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:52 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote: I would prefer to have that in the playground:theme=* tag, thus playground=structure and playground:theme=octopus_mountain|ship|castle|dungeon|etc If they were a one-off, yea, but they are a named playgrou