Re: [Tagging] Local highways classifications

2015-07-16 Thread Richard Mann
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:23 PM, wrote: > On Thu Jul 16 15:06:34 2015 GMT+0100, Richard Mann wrote: > > For those interested, the issue appears to be that the Poles can have > > multiple routes on one road section (fine, just like the Americans, use > > relations), but also the same route number

Re: [Tagging] Local highways classifications

2015-07-16 Thread phil
On Thu Jul 16 15:06:34 2015 GMT+0100, Richard Mann wrote: > For those interested, the issue appears to be that the Poles can have > multiple routes on one road section (fine, just like the Americans, use > relations), but also the same route number can get used on a series of > roads of different c

Re: [Tagging] Local highways classifications

2015-07-16 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 16.07.2015 16:06, Richard Mann napisał(a): I'd probably do separate relations each time the classification changes, and let people combine information as they see fit. I'm not convinced that further tags would help. There is always problem of interpretation which OSM classification to

Re: [Tagging] Local highways classifications

2015-07-16 Thread Richard Mann
For those interested, the issue appears to be that the Poles can have multiple routes on one road section (fine, just like the Americans, use relations), but also the same route number can get used on a series of roads of different classification. So route 2 goes from Germany to Warsaw as a motorwa

Re: [Tagging] Local highways classifications

2015-07-16 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 16.07.2015 15:16, Richard Mann napisał(a): You might have to explain a little more what the issue is, if you want comments from people from other countries who don't speak much/any Polish... I gave the link only as a convenience for those who speak or may be otherwise interested. The

Re: [Tagging] Local highways classifications

2015-07-16 Thread johnw
Japan has a bad habit of tagging tunnels in remote mountain passes (on trunk roads) as motorways because they are toll roads and have no pedestrian traffic - but they are just a toll trunk road in a tunnel. it is not a motorway. They have an even more horrible practice of aligning the unclassif

Re: [Tagging] Local highways classifications

2015-07-16 Thread Richard Mann
You might have to explain a little more what the issue is, if you want comments from people from other countries who don't speak much/any Polish... On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Koć wrote: > There's a lengthy discussion going on polish forum about using > motorway/trunk tagging for our

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-16 Thread johnw
> On Jul 16, 2015, at 8:57 PM, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: > > Agreed. My understanding from johnw's mail was that the other sections > were not even cordoned-off yet. In my experience (Ireland/France), > this is the usual way that road builders do things. Yea, the land in the planned sections has

Re: [Tagging] Local highways classifications

2015-07-16 Thread Holger Jeromin
Daniel Ko? Wrote in message: > There's a lengthy discussion going on polish forum about using > motorway/trunk tagging for our main highways: > > http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31488 > > It looks that whatever solution we will choose, there's no clear mapping > between OSM an

[Tagging] Local highways classifications

2015-07-16 Thread Daniel Koć
There's a lengthy discussion going on polish forum about using motorway/trunk tagging for our main highways: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31488 It looks that whatever solution we will choose, there's no clear mapping between OSM and country-level classification of highways,

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-16 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 16/07/2015, jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me wrote: > I would say it depends if the untouched land is still in its original use or > not. If it is then mark it as planned, if it’s cordoned off waiting for the > construction to get there then I would mark it as under construction. Agreed. My understan

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-16 Thread jonathan
I would say it depends if the untouched land is still in its original use or not. If it is then mark it as planned, if it’s cordoned off waiting for the construction to get there then I would mark it as under construction. Jonathan http://bigfatfrog67.me From: johnw Sent: ‎Thursday‎,

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-16 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 16/07/2015, johnw wrote: > Ran into this issue today. They are constructing a new trunk road in an > area I’m mapping, an as is usual for Japan, they build the road in stages, > completing one stage before they go to the next. I know, down to about 20m, > the alignment of the sections to be bu

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-16 Thread johnw
Ran into this issue today. They are constructing a new trunk road in an area I’m mapping, an as is usual for Japan, they build the road in stages, completing one stage before they go to the next. I know, down to about 20m, the alignment of the sections to be built - so do I mark the whole road