On 24/02/2015 4:41 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
A strongly related discussion:
tagging the difference between an official trail,
and shortcut / use trail / squatter trail.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/
> On Feb 25, 2015, at 3:55 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
> The editing tools have a role here, with iD leading the way.
>
> With iD one writes the thing, for example a "bathroom".
> The editor matches this to available tags and lets you choose.
> It even hides the actual tag name (amenity=toilet m
Hi,
Well it has been 3 weeks for the comments .. a few
changes/modifications, thanks for those.
Time now to vote...
Review the whole page - from the top
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Temperature
Or go straight to voting
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_fea
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I'd expect the width to be the width of the bollard and maxwidth the (in
> theory "legal") width of the vehicle that can pass through (e.g. number
> taken by reading off a sign) and you might want to add
> maxwidth:physical=1.22m (the
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Areas, e.g. National Parks, often have a blanket camping policy.
> For example "camp only in designated sites".
> Or "camp anywhere 200 feet from water". That too could use a tagging.
>
Restriction multipolygons?
__
Hi,
On 02/23/2015 02:43 AM, Kurt Blunt wrote:
> Right now, tags serve two distinct purposes. There are attribute tags
> like name=Wall Street, and there are category tags like
> amenity=parking or aeroway=helipad.
This works for many things but not all; the border can be blurred. You
will not be
Areas, e.g. National Parks, often have a blanket camping policy.
For example "camp only in designated sites".
Or "camp anywhere 200 feet from water". That too could use a tagging.
---
The official word on trails is often "use only officially maintained
trails",
but the actual practice is to tole
I think the top level keys have tremendous value.
For example the current scheme allows rendering of generic tourist
attractions and shops,
even if the individual shop types are unknown (e.g. the singular dog collar
shop in OSM and probably the world).
_
The editing tools have a role here, with iD leading the way.
With iD one writes the thing, for example a "bathroom".
The editor matches this to available tags and lets you choose.
It even hides the actual tag name (amenity=toilet most likely in this case).
Thus with a good set of aliases, the act
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Kurt Blunt wrote:
> When you want to tag the same point with multiple categories, those
> categories must share the same tag and be separated by a semicolon e.g.
> shop=convenience;alcohol. That is, unless the two categories are under two
> different super-keys
*Camping categories*
>From this discussion I propose to maintain three categories, but name them
as listed below. I give examples from own experience from our overland trip
from the Netherlands to South Africa in an attempt to answer the question
why we would want them on the map:
- Designated:
Perhaps there should also be a way to tag unofficial campsites where there
is evidence someone has camped in the past, but the action is now risky?
For example, the site is downhill from a slope where the ground is starting
to split open, meaning that there is a high risk of a landslide in the
On 24 February 2015 at 08:55, David Bannon wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 06:15 +, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
>
>>
>> What to do with places where one cannot camp?
>
> But your examples mostly focus on what were once campsites and are now
not. So is
> it camp_site=closed (or disused or similar) ?
>
In a previous thread on this mailing list, someone proposed
amenity=reception_desk. Someone else observed that the amenity key is where you
put a new tag when you don't know where else to put it. I think this is a
symptom of a bigger problem with tags on OSM.
Right now, tags serve two distinct
Markus (ScubbX), an Austrian here!
Two years ago I did an import of roughly 120.000 trees in vienna. Most of
them had their crown diameter as an attribute.
In a blog post I described the process:
https://gisforge.wordpress.com/2012/07/13/preparing-the-opengovernment-treecadastre-of-vienna-for-osm-i
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Jan van Bekkum
wrote:
> Thanks for all comments.
>
> I would like to throw another issue in before I update the proposal with
> the recommendations all of you made.
>
> What to do with places where one *cannot* camp? I have run in many
> situations where it would
16 matches
Mail list logo
