Re: [Tagging] Tagging private property

2015-01-10 Thread Michael Kugelmann
Am 02.01.2015 um 07:33 schrieb Megha Shrestha: Do we tag the whole area as owner =* ??? Oh no, please try to avoid this!!! We collect GEO-FACTS in OSM and are no land title register. Please also try to take care of privacy concerns. And think about that the fact needs to be checkable easily by

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC: Reverse Vending Machine

2015-01-10 Thread makko
Apparently there is no consensus what to use to indicate reverse vending machines (RVM). See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_vending_machine and: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Bottle_reverse_vending_machines I therefore would like to suggest a set of tags that can be u

Re: [Tagging] religion=multi* ?

2015-01-10 Thread Bryan Housel
In this dropdown, iD is simply returning the most popular results from taginfo: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/religion#values > On Jan 10, 2015, at 6:57 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > well that explains the slightly, but not signi

Re: [Tagging] religion=multi* ?

2015-01-10 Thread Tom Pfeifer
well that explains the slightly, but not significantly, higher usage numbers on this value. Interesting enough that iD implements a value that is not even documented. Jack Burke wrote on 2015-01-10 20:18: The ID editor already has multifaith as a selectable pull-down item for the religion= tag

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 64, Issue 30

2015-01-10 Thread Jack Burke
The ID editor already has multifaith as a selectable pull-down item for the religion= tag. On January 9, 2015 7:23:54 PM EST, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: >Send Tagging mailing list submissions to > tagging@openstreetmap.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide We

Re: [Tagging] Tag destination vs. relation destination_sign

2015-01-10 Thread Marc Gemis
Don't forget there is also a proposal for specifying more details on the destination key. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination_details It also allows to specify colour. regards m On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Lukas Sommer wrote: > Looking at the description, I c

Re: [Tagging] Tag destination vs. relation destination_sign

2015-01-10 Thread Lukas Sommer
Looking at the description, I could imagine that the original idea was to use key:destination on motorways and similar roads (primary WITH primary_junction), because there you have normally no crossroads, but only “y junctions” on oneways. So for motorways it is more likely that there is only one v

Re: [Tagging] Tag destination vs. relation destination_sign

2015-01-10 Thread Marc Gemis
I've asked this question several months ago on the help-website [1]. When should I use destination and when the relation? Until now I did not get any answer. Only recently I noticed the sentence you are referring to. From then on, I followed this advice. So I'm interested to learn which is the pre

[Tagging] Tag destination vs. relation destination_sign

2015-01-10 Thread Martin Vonwald
Hi! Currently it reads in the section "When to use" on the wiki page of the key destination [1]: "Attention: Do not use them for mapping at highway=primary and highway=secondary (or smaller). In such cases, a destination sign relation is the recommended way for direction directives. " Also above