[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - amenity=public_bookcase

2014-12-28 Thread Guillaume Pratte
Hello, Following the comments held on this list and on the discussion page on amenity=public_bookcase, I updated the amenity=public_bookcase wiki page, and documented how the Little Free Library project can be mapped. I would now like to propose voting on this proposal. Here is the wiki link:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Bryan Housel
Yes, `amenity` please. A gym is something people want to know about when traveling, just as much as other tourist stuff, food, lodging, etc. > On Dec 28, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > > The only other tag that would work is amenity=fitness_centre. Taginfo would > indicate that am

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Andreas Goss wrote: > ess_centre:access=membership, fitness_centre:access=club? private? > Or have something like fitness_centre=yes? (Not sure as we already have > sport=*) > > Honestly didn't think that much about this, because I just wanted a tag in > the first

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Andreas Goss
Water fountains, benches, parking, etc. aren't tagged any different just because they are located inside a sports centre. But are people searching for that the same way? If I look for stuff like that I'm probably somewhere outside and just look what's near me. Then I probaby realize pretty fas

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 63, Issue 83

2014-12-28 Thread Ulrich Lamm
Am 28.12.2014 um 20:42 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org: > From: Mateusz Konieczny > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Shared foot- and cycletracks > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Please, stop propo

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 63, Issue 83

2014-12-28 Thread Ulrich Lamm
Am 28.12.2014 um 20:42 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org: > Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:22:47 +0100 > From: Mateusz Konieczny > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Crowded links between carriageway and > cycletrack > Message-ID: >

Re: [Tagging] Cleanup flood tagging

2014-12-28 Thread Lukas Sommer
PS: About 57% of the key “flood_prone” is “flood_prone=yes”. About 42% of the key “flood_prone” is “flood_prone=no”. About 80% of the elements with the flood_prone key are in 15 km × 15 km area in Jakarta. Lukas Sommer 2014-12-28 20:32 GMT+01:00 Lukas Sommer : > Hello. > > In OSM there seems to b

[Tagging] Cleanup flood tagging

2014-12-28 Thread Lukas Sommer
Hello. In OSM there seems to be concurrent 2 tagging systems for flood tagging. And each of them seems to be incomplete. Just to remember: There are several types of flood. I think the most common types are: – case 1: caused by heavy rainfall: “on flat or low-lying areas when the ground is satur

Re: [Tagging] oneway=no spams

2014-12-28 Thread Simon Poole
Am 28.12.2014 um 19:20 schrieb Andy Street:. > These tags are far from "information-less" as they convey the fact that > a mapper has considered the property in question and wishes to record > that it does not apply. I'm afraid that you are kidding yourself in a big way. Nearly all massive, "I wi

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Andreas Goss wrote: > Because that's my issue when having leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing >> as tag for your usual commercial gym. >> > > Oops. I mean sport=fitness > > (So a rowing club would be fine with leisure=sports_centre + > sport=rowing,fitness) Are

Re: [Tagging] Shared foot- and cycletracks

2014-12-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
Please, stop proposing tags conflicting with widely used ones. Also, your example with Poland is incorrect (pedestrians have priority over cyclists). 2014-12-28 18:35 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Lamm : > Hi mapping and cycling friends, > > I have suggested a special highway-class for the slim tagging of th

Re: [Tagging] Crowded links between carriageway and cycletrack

2014-12-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
It is better to map all existing connections between road and cycleway rather than add this tag (too complicated, anyway it will be not supported by routers). 2014-12-28 18:29 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Lamm : > Hi mapping and cycling friends, > > I have suggested an overall parameter for separately drawn

Re: [Tagging] oneway=no spams

2014-12-28 Thread Andy Street
On Sun, 28 Dec 2014 17:01:16 +0100 Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > I notice a quicky increasing number of oneway=no tags on roads, > probably due to editors offering some flashy list box for the oneway > key. Or perhaps due to diligent mappers? > I wonder what's next. bridge=no, tunnel=no...? If

[Tagging] Shared foot- and cycletracks

2014-12-28 Thread Ulrich Lamm
Hi mapping and cycling friends, I have suggested a special highway-class for the slim tagging of this very common kind of cycling facilities that up to now affords a combination of four tags. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/foot_cycleway Yours' Ulrich

[Tagging] Crowded crossings of a cycletrack and particular accessways

2014-12-28 Thread Ulrich Lamm
Hi mapping and cycling friends, I have suggested an overall parameter for separately drawn cycletracks to record the (average) layout of crowded crossings of a cycletrack and particular accessways. As these crossings at the same time serve as links between cycletrack and carriageway, the combin

[Tagging] Crowded links between carriageway and cycletrack

2014-12-28 Thread Ulrich Lamm
Hi mapping and cycling friends, I have suggested an overall parameter for separately drawn cycletracks, to record crowded links between roadside cycletrack and carriageway: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Traverse_link Yours' Ulrich

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Andreas Goss
Because that's my issue when having leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing as tag for your usual commercial gym. Oops. I mean sport=fitness (So a rowing club would be fine with leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing,fitness) __ openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88 wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Us

Re: [Tagging] oneway=no spams

2014-12-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
"you'd probably want to discuss that over at https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues"; I thought that https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2220 will fix this problem. 2014-12-28 17:27 GMT+01:00 SomeoneElse : > On 28/12/2014 16:01, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > >> I think that those editor

Re: [Tagging] oneway=no spams

2014-12-28 Thread Ole Nielsen / osm
> I notice a quicky increasing number of oneway=no tags on roads, probably > due > to editors offering some flashy list box for the oneway key. I wonder > what's > next. bridge=no, tunnel=no...? > > I find these information-less tags annoying, because you have to browse a > long list of bogus tags

Re: [Tagging] oneway=no spams

2014-12-28 Thread SomeoneElse
On 28/12/2014 16:01, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: I think that those editors should only make , "yes" and "-1" selectable, or omit the "no" values on upload at last, except for motorways, motorway_links and roundabouts. I don't believe that there's yet an automatic interface between mailing list a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Andreas Goss wrote: > That's fine for a stuation like that, but do want to join a rowing club > when you just moved to a city and a looking for a fitness centre to work > out? > Because that's my issue when having leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing > as tag for

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Andreas Goss
I like the idea of tagging the clubs's entire property as leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing, and additionally sport=fitness (or sport=gymnastics) to the building or room dedicated to that. But I wouldn't tag it as a leisure=sports_centre on its own. It is only part of the surrounding sports_cen

[Tagging] oneway=no spams

2014-12-28 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
I notice a quicky increasing number of oneway=no tags on roads, probably due to editors offering some flashy list box for the oneway key. I wonder what's next. bridge=no, tunnel=no...? I find these information-less tags annoying, because you have to browse a long list of bogus tags on each object

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-28 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 27.12.2014 16:20, Andreas Goss wrote: >> What's wrong with sport=fitness and leisure=sports_centre? > > Persoanlly I think it would result in all kind of facilities being tagged > like this, even though it's not the primary purpose. For example someone > posted a User Diary entry about rowing c