Re: [Tagging] Various alt_name values?

Hi, On 11/25/14 00:35, Frederik Ramm wrote: > There was a discsussion on the talk/imports lists recently (September, Duh. I should have read Lukas' post before writing ;) Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _

Re: [Tagging] Various alt_name values?

+1 I agree with alt_name=name1;name2 On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Lukas Sommer wrote: > Some time ago, there was a discussion on the “talk” mailing list about how > to deal with the situation of more than one alt_name: > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-September/070838

Re: [Tagging] Various alt_name values?

Hi, On 11/24/2014 11:51 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > The semi-colon is not universally accepted, for good reasons. Contrary > to what you said, it should only be used if it is explicitly defined as > an option for that particular key. To introduce such a convention to an > old and widely used set of

Re: [Tagging] Various alt_name values?

On 23.11.2014 19:46, Zecke wrote: > Am 23.11.2014 18:20, schrieb Lukas Sommer: >> Would a feature proposal be a good way to get there? > No need to do so. The semi-colon is the accepted way to separate multi > values in cases where there's no other scheme defined. > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi

Re: [Tagging] Various alt_name values?

Am 24.11.2014 um 20:32 schrieb Lukas Sommer: > Okay, so I would place a hint at the corresponding wiki page … +1 Do we recommend any order ? youngest to oldest ? > 2014-11-23 18:46 GMT+00:00 Zecke >: > > Am 23.11.2014 18:20, schrieb Lukas Sommer: > > W

Re: [Tagging] Various alt_name values?

Okay, so I would place a hint at the corresponding wiki page … Lukas Sommer 2014-11-23 18:46 GMT+00:00 Zecke : > Am 23.11.2014 18:20, schrieb Lukas Sommer: > >> Would a feature proposal be a good way to get there? >> > No need to do so. The semi-colon is the accepted way to separate multi > valu

Re: [Tagging] sport= non-physical tags and the exceptions people come up with...

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:53:32PM +0100, Colin Smale wrote: > > > Let's look at the entity relations in play here. Surely a club IS an > organisation, not a building. The club MAY USE one or more buildings, > and MAY OWN one or more buildings. A club HAS a contact address, HAS > members, HAS a

Re: [Tagging] Adding values to usage=* key for power transmission

Hi Rainer and thank you. I didn't spend time yet on the update done on the Pipeline proposal but be sure I will. What were the concern against network=* tag ? If they can be avoided with usage=* (or any common key) I'm ok to join you to use the same between power transmission and pipelines. Che

Re: [Tagging] Adding values to usage=* key for power transmission

hi, FL> I knew usage=* and it can be the ideal key to indicate usage=transmission, FL> usage=distribution,... on power lines or power cables. If I'm not mistaken, this key is intended to serve the same purpose as the network=* key is in the pipeline proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/

Re: [Tagging] sport= non-physical tags and the exceptions people come up with...

Let's look at the entity relations in play here. Surely a club IS an organisation, not a building. The club MAY USE one or more buildings, and MAY OWN one or more buildings. A club HAS a contact address, HAS members, HAS a "board" etc etc. So following the rules of "one object, one set of tags",

Re: [Tagging] sport= non-physical tags and the exceptions people come up with...

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:13:07PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2014-11-24 13:57 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. : > > > > > According to the approved > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Club > > chess has an own club=chess, as has fishing, automobile, hiking - all > > of which ca

Re: [Tagging] sport= non-physical tags and the exceptions people come up with...

2014-11-24 13:57 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. : > > According to the approved > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Club > chess has an own club=chess, as has fishing, automobile, hiking - all > of which can be either leisure type or sport type activities. > > I think "club=automobile" f

Re: [Tagging] sport= non-physical tags and the exceptions people come up with...

sorry, didn't see your email earlier. On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 09:27:03AM +0100, Andreas Goss wrote: > >The club page seems to suggest > >that club=sport + sport=cycling type tagging should be used for competitive > >sports. > > Which in my optinion is a bad idea, too. There is really no generel >

[Tagging] access in the wiki

We are currently trying on the Italian mailing list to get a good tagging for the ZTL (zona a traffico limitato - limited traffic zone), which do exist in various Italian cities and are not "LEZ" (low emmission zones) because the latter according to the wiki and external definitions are zones which