Indeed, data consumers should look at both variants, since the contact:*
keys have a considerable number of uses.
2014-06-16 8:11 GMT-03:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
> 2014-06-16 12:44 GMT+02:00 Mike N :
>
> More importantly, to those who actually care about a data consumer using
>> their POI: I'm
2014-06-16 12:44 GMT+02:00 Mike N :
> More importantly, to those who actually care about a data consumer using
> their POI: I'm not aware of any consumers that use the contact:phone
> version.
I think any consumer should have a look at both variants (in my small
projects I do this and I believe
On 6/16/2014 5:08 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I think still more people are using phone without the "contact:" prefix,
(now it is 347k vs. 63k), and this relation will probably not change.
More importantly, to those who actually care about a data consumer
using their POI: I'm not aware of
2014-06-16 0:23 GMT+02:00 André Pirard :
> survey is hence supposed to exist beside source information having
> publication date or not, "spoke to a local" being generally "knowledge" etc.
is it a "survey" if I go to check in the archives of the municipality what
is the correct spelling of a ro
2014-06-16 5:28 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss :
> I have honestly never seen a single POI that uses contact:phone. Also both
> ID and JOSM seem to support phone=* in their presets.
+1,
I think still more people are using phone without the "contact:" prefix,
(now it is 347k vs. 63k), and this relation
