If the timber is on the ground, then the forest is exploited: landuse=forest.
Later on, if you have other information, and if new trees aren't growing, then
you can change.
On 4 mai 2014 15:29:12 UTC+02:00, Thomas Gertin wrote:
>Thanks fly and everyone else to responding to my deforestation
>qu
Thanks fly and everyone else to responding to my deforestation question. I
don't really know if it is better to use landcover or land use because the
areas were deforested at one point and you can see the fallen tress on the
ground, but it is unsure how the land
will be used next. I do not see
Landcover describes what covers the land, landuse what is it used for by man.
Hence landcover=grass and landuse=meadow, you can perfectly use these two tags
on the same polygon, or on two overlapping ones.
Yves
On 4 mai 2014 12:32:08 UTC+02:00, John Packer wrote:
>I didn't understand.
>When is l
> Am 04/mag/2014 um 12:00 schrieb Pieren :
>
> -1
> Since "landuse" and "landcover" are not always matching, you create
> two separate layers of "land" polygons partially overlapping each
> other.
naturally, this is how the world is made. IMHO representing reality with its
different aspects i
I didn't understand.
When is landuse=grass and landcover=grass different things?
Em 04/05/2014 07:02, "Pieren" escreveu:
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:21 PM, John Packer
> wrote:
> >> +1, landuse=grass does not make sense, as "grass" is not a "use", use
> >> landcover=grass for grass covered areas,
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:21 PM, John Packer wrote:
>> +1, landuse=grass does not make sense, as "grass" is not a "use", use
>> landcover=grass for grass covered areas, and landuse=meadow, if it is a
>> meadow
> I would love to replace all landuse=grass to landcover=grass on my city, but
> Mapnik d
