Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - All You Can Eat

2014-02-28 Thread John Packer
> > When you say "no longer appropriate", do you mean to say the > all_you_can_eat idea is not appropriate, or that working through the > approval procedure got bogged down? ;-) > I feel the idea is not appropriate, at least not to my initial needs. I started this proposal to be able to tag some bu

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - All You Can Eat

2014-02-28 Thread Dave Swarthout
@John, When you say "no longer appropriate", do you mean to say the all_you_can_eat idea is not appropriate, or that working through the approval procedure got bogged down? ;-) In a first reading of the new proposal I see you did not include all_you_can_eat as a value or tag and I assume you now

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - All You Can Eat

2014-02-28 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:15 PM, John Packer wrote: > Amigos, > > I no longer feel this proposal is appropriate, therefore I'm canceling it. > Thanks for all your comments. > Remember it's still OK to write a note (in the local language preferably) associated with any node. Not everything is de

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - All You Can Eat

2014-02-28 Thread John Packer
Amigos, I no longer feel this proposal is appropriate, therefore I'm canceling it. Thanks for all your comments. I am creating another proposal to describe the serving system of a restaurant. It is based on all_you_can_eat:type from this proposal, which I found to be quite interesting when used p