Am 05.02.2014 07:44, schrieb Kytömaa Lauri:
>
> Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> does not represent what's on the ground: there won't be a "one way
>> street" sign.
>
> Dual carriage roads don't have one way signs, either, but the parts
> have oneway=yes. I just noticed that the relatively recently change
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>does not represent what's on the ground: there won't be a "one way street"
>sign.
Dual carriage roads don't have one way signs, either, but the parts have
oneway=yes. I just noticed that the relatively recently changed description on
the Key:oneway wiki page is even wron
The downside of the "tiny one way street" is that it does not represent
what's on the ground: there won't be a "one way street" sign.
The turn restriction relation seems a more accurate model of what's going
on.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstree
Martin Vonwald wrote:
>>3 Cut the way where the sign is into a tiny piece of way. Add a
>>motorcar:backward =no to this tiny piece of way.
>
>That variant has been used in my area. The "tiny piece" is usually the part
>from the junction up to where the sign is located.
This is the oldest commo
