On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Duplicating the relation seems easiest and is what I'd probably do,
> but of course it is not 100% correct as there aren't two different
> admin boundaries (or, in the case of Hamburg, and Berlin, three - here
> admin_levels 4,6,8 are folded
Am 05.11.2013 um 22:14 schrieb Matthijs Melissen :
> And what
> is the opinion of other users about moving casino into the leisure tag
> space?
I don't see any advantage. Leisure so far was used mostly for sport related
places, parks, nature reserves and playgrounds, generally casinos and eve
On 3 November 2013 22:14, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:58 PM, fly wrote:
>> I wonder if we should not use leisure in general and try to avoid
>> amenity. At least for new tags and tags with low numbers leisure=*
>> should be used.
> amenity=casino is the most used tag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 05.11.2013 16:22, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> A fix would be an admin_level=6;8 on the boundary or duplicating
> the relation.
Duplicating the relation seems easiest and is what I'd probably do,
but of course it is not 100% correct as there aren'
2013/11/5 Pieren
> I'm surprised you still have such questions in Germany. Your
> description is not clear since you don't explain what is on the way
> and what is on the relation.
>
it shouldn't matter. Mostly you don't need a relation at all (if not to
reduce redundancy by overlapping ways),
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:55:42PM +0100, Pieren wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> > A fix would be an admin_level=6;8 on the boundary or duplicating
> > the relation.
>
> I'm surprised you still have such questions in Germany. Your
> description is not clear sin
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 06:18:44PM +0100, Colin Smale wrote:
> In the UK we do the opposite. In "Unitary Authorities", which combine
> the role of the "county" with the "district" (sounds like the same as
> the Kreisfreie Staedte) we tag the UA as admin_level=6, i.e. at the same
> level as co
In the UK we do the opposite. In "Unitary Authorities", which combine
the role of the "county" with the "district" (sounds like the same as
the Kreisfreie Staedte) we tag the UA as admin_level=6, i.e. at the same
level as counties, and not admin_level=8 which is the level for the
"districts".
>"But, as already said, the oneway restriction applies to the whole way,
>for all vehicles arriving there, even from private properties. Where
>stops or giveway are just prioritizing the access to an intersection."
-because one of the way has priority in the intersection among the others.
As you mi
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> A fix would be an admin_level=6;8 on the boundary or duplicating
> the relation.
I'm surprised you still have such questions in Germany. Your
description is not clear since you don't explain what is on the way
and what is on the relation. B
"please GPS, tell me the traffic signs I'm just seeing
now with my eyes".
That is the point! because if you need to figure out how has a priority, or
where you can turn - then you often dont find any sign at your way. A no
entry sign for example. or if you can not see a priority road sign it does
And in the UK, I have only come across priority diamonds in mainland Europe.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 05/11/2013 15:20 Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Balázs Barcsik wrote:
So I would prefer to create such tags for priority cases - which can be
ass
Hi,
in Germany we have the concept of countys and citys within those
countys. E.g. admin_level=8 within admin_level=6.
Now as an exception every rule follows bigger citys are their own
countys, or dont belong to a county. (Kreisfreie Städte)
Administrative wise these citys take all administrati
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Balázs Barcsik wrote:
> So I would prefer to create such tags for priority cases - which can be
> assigned to ways
This breaks down in North America, which lacks this concept.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetm
2013/11/5 Erik Johansson
> I think it's not such a good idea to use leisure=playground + fee=yes,
> since it most certainly is not a playground, but sure playgrounds
> really do span a very big range from a sandbox to extremely large
> contraptions .
>
+1, I think his current proposal leisure=i
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Balázs Barcsik wrote:
> Do you think that routing/navigation apps are using turn restrictions tags
> instead of oneway tag to create the route?
> I dont think so...
Back to your original post, you want to introduce alerts into
navigation tools. But you seem to have
There are lots of cases where routing software uses turn restrictions, it would
be next to useless if it relied on oneways alone.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 05/11/2013 13:09 Balázs Barcsik wrote:
Do you think that routing/navigation apps are using turn restrictions tags
in
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Balázs Barcsik wrote:
> Do you think that routing/navigation apps are using turn restrictions tags
> instead of oneway tag to create the route?I dont think so...
It's still wrong even if everyone would be doing it. :-) And btw, I was
only saying that in order to get it right,
Do you think that routing/navigation apps are using turn restrictions tags
instead of oneway tag to create the route?
I dont think so...
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Balázs Barcsik wrote:
>
> > Think about oneway
> > tag.http://wiki.openstreetmap.or
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Balázs Barcsik wrote:
> Think about oneway
> tag.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing
> That is a property of a way.
> So as a routing app I just would like to examine this tag, and forget the
> relations restrictions:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rel
Think about oneway tag.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing
That is a property of a way.
So as a routing app I just would like to examine this tag, and forget the
relations restrictions:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Because it is a redundancy - if the
My understanding is that a give_way node on a way should be placed such
that it is closer to the relevant intersection than it is to any other
intersection of that way. Thus, as long as you can work out (from this
proximity) which intersection it relates to, you have all the
information you nee
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Balázs Barcsik
> 1. extend highway=give_way (and stop) to able to use on ways
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dgive_way
And how to interpret the tag if the way is between two intersections ?
Surely not a good solution.
> 2. define a new tag:
It has occured to me that this seems to be more of something simliar
to tourism=theme_park, yet smaller. I don't know if there is such a
tag that is widespread or if it's better to use your own tag.
I think it's not such a good idea to use leisure=playground + fee=yes,
since it most certainly is
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Tod Fitch wrote:
> I personally find the traffic_signal:direction tag to be clunky, but it is
> in the wiki for traffic signals where many/most mappers will find it. And
> traffic signals are a member of the same class as stop and yield signs in
> my mind: Things t
> Am 05/nov/2013 um 08:32 schrieb Manuel Hohmann
> :
>
> Yes, indeed I was thinking about this (or rather light_fitting, which
> should be UK English), which would be the correct technical term. I
> finally used lamp for the following reasons:
If I see this right, lamp technically seems to re
26 matches
Mail list logo
