> In the UK, the most common weight restriction is '7.5t except for
access'.
Which doesn't answer the question, so I had to do some digging: no sources seem
to mention any traffic signs in the UK that would limit the actual laden weight
- only the what's-in-the-papers-maximum is used. Which see
Am 11.07.2013 23:02, schrieb fly:
> Am 11.07.2013 22:55, schrieb Masi Master:
>> Am 11.07.2013, 16:06 Uhr, schrieb fly :
>>
>>> Am 10.07.2013 20:34, schrieb doug brown:
I wish to map the trails in a state park, many of which are multiple
use horse trails, hiking trails, and mountain biki
On 7/11/13 4:55 PM, Masi Master wrote:
Am 11.07.2013, 16:06 Uhr, schrieb fly :
Am 10.07.2013 20:34, schrieb doug brown:
I wish to map the trails in a state park, many of which are multiple
use horse trails, hiking trails, and mountain biking trails. What
tagging scheme would be appropriate fo
Am 11.07.2013 22:55, schrieb Masi Master:
> Am 11.07.2013, 16:06 Uhr, schrieb fly :
>
>> Am 10.07.2013 20:34, schrieb doug brown:
>>> I wish to map the trails in a state park, many of which are multiple
>>> use horse trails, hiking trails, and mountain biking trails. What
>>> tagging scheme woul
Am 11.07.2013, 16:06 Uhr, schrieb fly :
Am 10.07.2013 20:34, schrieb doug brown:
I wish to map the trails in a state park, many of which are multiple
use horse trails, hiking trails, and mountain biking trails. What
tagging scheme would be appropriate for these trails?
I stopped using *ways
An update on the proposal.
Following a suggestion on the talk page, I have dropped "sometimes" from
the proposal page and replaced it with "conditional", a tag expressing more
information and in greater use.
A few other refinements have be made on the proposal page.
After trial tagging with arti
On 07/02/2013 09:46 PM, Felix Delattre wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> please vote for this feature proposal:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/reference_point
One week has passed and so far the proposal has three votes. All are
approvals and all are from the first day. I would
Am 11.07.2013, 04:42 Uhr, schrieb Friedrich Volkmann :
On 10.07.2013 18:39, Masi Master wrote:
some mappers think, they have to set these access tags. Potlatch and iD
have
a select menue, which shout "hey, please select foot & bicycle are
allowed".
But I think this is not good!
That's als
not bicycle-free!it means that bicycles are freed from the law by the upper sign.Example: http://stefanhock.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/ubstadt_haltestelleuhlandstrac39fe_schild_20120513_2_1024.jpgok, "bicycles allowed" match better to the sign.Am 11.07.2013, 16:09 Uhr, schrieb John F. Eldredge :
Am 11.07.2013 10:35, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
>
> On 11/lug/2013, at 08:21, "Ilpo Järvinen" wrote:
>
>> However, I can also understand why many people don't see the point with
>> the actual signs :-) ...and the quality of the signage might be area
>> dependent.
>
>
> +1, I also find T
Am 10.07.2013 15:42, schrieb Richard Mann:
> If you add bicycle=yes, they render differently in opencyclemap (not
> saying that's a good thing, just an observation). It seems to be used to
> imply that it's reasonably passable by bike, and nobody seems to object.
Yeah this is a problem with taggin
Wouldn't bicycle-free mean an absence of bicycles, in other words bicycle=no?
Masi Master wrote:
> Hi,
> some mappers think, they have to set these access tags. Potlatch and
> iD
> have a select menue, which shout "hey, please select foot & bicycle
> are
> allowed". But I think this is not g
Am 10.07.2013 20:34, schrieb doug brown:
> I wish to map the trails in a state park, many of which are multiple
> use horse trails, hiking trails, and mountain biking trails. What
> tagging scheme would be appropriate for these trails?
I stopped using *ways as values and only use path with
bicyc
Primarily a horse trail (not so good for cycling or walking): highway=bridleway
Primarily a hiking trail: highway=path
Primarily a mountain biking trail: highway=path, mtb=yes (maybe foot=no)
Primarily a normal bike path: highway=cycleway, foot=yes
(And one hundred other opinions. :))
Adding rou
On 11/lug/2013, at 08:21, "Ilpo Järvinen" wrote:
> However, I can also understand why many people don't see the point with
> the actual signs :-) ...and the quality of the signage might be area
> dependent.
+1, I also find Traffic signs useful, especially maxspeed signs, as those seem
to b
15 matches
Mail list logo
