Dear community,
please vote for this feature proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/reference_point
This is needed to get proper route-planning working in all Central
American countries.
Thank you for all the feedback given and special thanks to Brycenesbitt
[1] for revi
When traveling, I enjoy stopping at farm stands, where freshly grown
produce can be purchased.
I tag them http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfarm
Some farm stands actually sell in-season produce direct off the adjacent
farm. Others, which look the same from the road, sell imported good
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:34 PM, fly wrote:
> I have no problem in reverting my changes but please give me one reason
> why you can not live with diet:gluten_free=*. I do not want to revert my
> changeset now only to have a bot redo it in a week.
I don't know how long you've been with the proje
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I have no strong opinion on the general idea but one thing sticks out:
> "operational_status=operating".
> Obviously, this should be the default assumption. If there's a toilet
> mapped then I assume that it is working.
>
I have added a not
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 5:07 AM, fly wrote:
> Exactly, what you do describe won't work. Please use a prefix if
> something is broken. Software which wants to display these kind of
> broken objects can look for this prefix and all other simply ignore it.
>
> It would be really dangerous in a dry a
Discussion seems to have died down. Any last comments on
toilets:disposal and toilets:position before I open it up for vote?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> I've opened this up for comment:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets
>
__
Am 01.07.2013 17:32, schrieb fly:
> * I did add links to diet from both pages and moved both under the
> proposal namespace and marked both for deletion
Well, gluten_free was just reverted and moved back under Tag:.
Could some wiki-admin please fix this and move it back. I just did what
Frederik
In my case, I would prefer a desert_oasis to a dessert_oasis. A desert, with
one S, is an area that gets little rainfall. A dessert, with a double S, is a
sweet food usually eaten at the end of a meal.
On topic, items or services that are both scarce and essential to life should
be checked pe
Am 02.07.2013 21:00, schrieb Serge Wroclawski:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:59 PM, fly wrote:
>
>> Please, tell me the difference between gluten_free=* and
>> diet:gluten_free=* and document them in the wiki.
>
> The difference is that one is the that was in higher usage than the other.
If this i
Then what about maxactualweight as its counterpart?
yes, good idea. Better than maxladenweight, which can be misunderstood
as the weight of the load.
martinq
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listin
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:59 PM, fly wrote:
> Please, tell me the difference between gluten_free=* and
> diet:gluten_free=* and document them in the wiki.
The difference is that one is the that was in higher usage than the other.
>> * The wiki reflected *actual usage* of the gluten_free tag, of
Hi martinq,
Am Dienstag, 2. Juli 2013, 20:01:59 schrieb martinq:
> For highest level of confusion, "gross weight" is not used as (short)
> synonym for *permissible* maximum mass everywhere.
>
> In contrary! In US they distinguish between:
> GVW = gross vehicle weight, meaning the *ACTUAL* weight
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> A telephone that is already tagged as functional would not normally be
> re-tagged as functional just to say "yes, it still is". This means that the
> "operational_status:date" tag is superfluous, since it will always be the
> date of the cha
there is one additional observation from my side:
For highest level of confusion, "gross weight" is not used as (short)
synonym for *permissible* maximum mass everywhere.
In contrary! In US they distinguish between:
GVW = gross vehicle weight, meaning the *ACTUAL* weight
GVWR = gross vehicle w
Am 01.07.2013 19:00, schrieb Craig Wallace:
> On 2013-06-28 14:36, fly wrote:
>> On 26.06.2013 02:29, Murry McEntire wrote:
>>
>>> If tags are added to diet=*, I believe lactose_free is in common use
>>> whereas lacto_free is not so much. Also consider that a product made
>>> with lactose removed d
Am 01.07.2013 18:29, schrieb Serge Wroclawski:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:32 AM, fly wrote:
>
>> * I did add diet:gluten_free= to all objects with gluten_free=.
>> * I did add diet:lacto_free=* and diet:lactose_free=*
>> * I did add links to diet from both pages and moved both under the
>> propo
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Frederik Ramm
> wrote:
> > This leads to a situation where a mapper is expected to, as he or she
> walks
> > the streets, update every object in the database with "yep, this is still
> > there, I walked past
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> * I feel that it should be stated that *only* images under a free
> license should be linked, i.e. images that offer the same freedoms as
> OpenStreetMap data.
>
The license of both images and the OSM database may evolve or change from
time t
On 02.07.2013 17:56, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Image
> This tag has over 12,000 uses, and I feel it is time to define the
> expectations for the tag clearly.
Unfortunately, some crucial expectations that I have for linked images
are still missing:
After modifications based on comments, and discussion with stakeholders,
this proposal is now
open again for vote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Image
This tag has over 12,000 uses, and I feel it is time to define the
expectations for the tag clearly.
The big change is a def
On talk-fr somebody was wondering how to tag a building where a fire had
been. So the building is still there, but it's not usable anymore until
some major reconstruction takes place.
Jo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.ope
2013/7/2 Bryce Nesbitt
> So how *should* we annotate an object, which we believe to be
> a permanent part of the landscape,
> but which needs some form of descriptive note?
>
I'd say this depends on the object.
> Example: a restroom with a sign reading "Closed until July 2014 for
repairs",
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> A telephone that is already tagged as functional would not normally be
> re-tagged as functional just to say "yes, it still is". This means that the
> "operational_status:date" tag is superfluous, since it will always be the
> date of the chan
Hi,
On 07/02/2013 10:07 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
I don't think the situation you describe arises at all. There is never
any onus on any mapper to add extra redundant details - and it's
ridiculous to suggest otherwise.
[...]
Yes, that's effectively what I was trying to say, just avoiding words
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> This leads to a situation where a mapper is expected to, as he or she walks
> the streets, update every object in the database with "yep, this is still
> there, I walked past it right now". Because just as a toilet could fall into
> disrepai
25 matches
Mail list logo
