On 14/02/13 19:27, John F. Eldredge wrote:
Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
focal length (camera:focal ?) isn't a bad idea, but I think that the
most important tag is camera:direction.
I would think that information such as focal length would be difficult to
learn; the security authorities, whether
Am 14/feb/2013 um 17:57 schrieb Frank Villaro-Dixon :
> focal length (camera:focal ?) isn't a bad idea, but I think that the most
> important tag is camera:direction.
alternatively to direction tags you could have helper objects (camera target as
a node and a camera relation to link it to
Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
> On 14/02/13 16:53, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > 2013/2/14 Frank Villaro-Dixon :
> >> it's been some years now that this proposed feature has been in the
> draft
> >> section.
> >> I think it's now the time to RFC on this feature, what do you think
> ?
> >>
> >> The
On 14/02/13 16:53, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/2/14 Frank Villaro-Dixon :
it's been some years now that this proposed feature has been in the draft
section.
I think it's now the time to RFC on this feature, what do you think ?
The future goal is to starting to import/add correctly the CCTV
2013/2/14 Frank Villaro-Dixon :
> it's been some years now that this proposed feature has been in the draft
> section.
> I think it's now the time to RFC on this feature, what do you think ?
>
> The future goal is to starting to import/add correctly the CCTV public
> cameras in OSM.
>
> Let me know
Hi,
it's been some years now that this proposed feature has been in the
draft section.
I think it's now the time to RFC on this feature, what do you think ?
The future goal is to starting to import/add correctly the CCTV public
cameras in OSM.
Let me know if you have things to say ;)
https:
